Compositional Generalization in Spoken Language Understanding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
State-of-the-art spoken language understanding (SLU) models have shown tremendous success in benchmark SLU datasets, yet they still fail in many practical scenario due to the lack of model compositionality when trained on limited training data. In this paper, we study two types of compositionality: (a) novel slot combination, and (b) length generalization. We first conduct in-depth analysis, and find that state-of-the-art SLU models often learn spurious slot correlations during training, which leads to poor performance in both compositional cases. To mitigate these limitations, we create the first compositional splits of benchmark SLU datasets and we propose the first compositional SLU model, including compositional loss and paired training that tackle each compositional case respectively. On both benchmark and compositional splits in ATIS and SNIPS, we show that our compositional SLU model significantly outperforms (up to 5% F1 score) state-of-the-art BERT SLU model.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Dec 2023.
Builds on
28 of 46 references.
References · 28
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,157
- 2018Snips Voice Platform: an embedded Spoken Language Understanding system for private-by-design voice interfacescited by 376
- 2019Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?cited by 264
- 2019BERT for Joint Intent Classification and Slot Fillingcited by 195
- 2019Good-Enough Compositional Data Augmentationcited by 158
- 2020Compositional Generalization and Natural Language Variation: Can a Semantic Parsing Approach Handle Both?cited by 147
- 2016Attention-Based Recurrent Neural Network Models for Joint Intent Detection and Slot Fillingcited by 137
- 2020A Benchmark for Systematic Generalization in Grounded Language Understandingcited by 108
16 more
- 2019Compositional generalization through meta sequence-to-sequence learningcited by 98
- 2020Compositional Generalization via Neural-Symbolic Stack Machinescited by 80
- 2020Span-based Semantic Parsing for Compositional Generalizationcited by 77
- 2020Learning Compositional Rules via Neural Program Synthesiscited by 74
- 2020Improve Transformer Models with Better Relative Position Embeddingscited by 73
- 2021Making Transformers Solve Compositional Taskscited by 72
- 2020Learning to Recombine and Resample Data for Compositional Generalizationcited by 65
- 2018A Bi-model based RNN Semantic Frame Parsing Model for Intent Detection and Slot Fillingcited by 53
- 2019Environmental drivers of systematicity and generalization in a situated agentcited by 50
- 2020Compositional Networks Enable Systematic Generalization for Grounded Language Understandingcited by 18
- 2018Using Syntax to Ground Referring Expressions in Natural Imagescited by 16
- 2020Systematic Generalization on gSCAN with Language Conditioned Embeddingcited by 15
- 2018OneNet: Joint Domain, Intent, Slot Prediction for Spoken Language Understandingcited by 13
- 2020Think before you act: A simple baseline for compositional generalizationcited by 11
- 2019Data Augmentation with Atomic Templates for Spoken Language Understandingcited by 10
- 2019Iterative Delexicalization for Improved Spoken Language Understandingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.