mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding Multi-Modal Perception Using Behavioral Cloning for Peg-In-a-Hole Insertion Tasks

arXiv 2007.11646 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2020cs.RO cs.LGcited by 8

On the map: Offline RL and imitation learning from data → Robot learning from demonstration

Abstract (arXiv)

One of the main challenges in peg-in-a-hole (PiH) insertion tasks is in handling the uncertainty in the location of the target hole. In order to address it, high-dimensional sensor inputs from sensor modalities such as vision, force/torque sensing, and proprioception can be combined to learn control policies that are robust to this uncertainty in the target pose. Whereas deep learning has shown success in recognizing objects and making decisions with high-dimensional inputs, the learning procedure might damage the robot when applying directly trial- and-error algorithms on the real system. At the same time, learning from Demonstration (LfD) methods have been shown to achieve compelling performance in real robotic systems by leveraging demonstration data provided by experts. In this paper, we investigate the merits of multiple sensor modalities such as vision, force/torque sensors, and proprioception when combined to learn a controller for real world assembly operation tasks using LfD techniques. The study is limited to PiH insertions; we plan to extend the study to more experiments in the future. Additionally, we propose a multi-step-ahead loss function to improve the performance of the behavioral cloning method. Experimental results on a real manipulator support our findings, and show the effectiveness of the proposed loss function.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Robot learning from demonstration, one of 13 directions in Offline RL and imitation learning from data. Builds on 14 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2020.

Builds on

14 of 25 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2018Imitating Human Search Strategies for Assembly13 Sep

Other references · 13

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016End to End Learning for Self-Driving Carscited by 1,000
  3. 2017Learning Complex Dexterous Manipulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Demonstrationscited by 685
  4. 2018Behavioral Cloning from Observationcited by 482
  5. 2017Deep Imitation Learning for Complex Manipulation Tasks from Virtual Reality Teleoperationcited by 286
  6. 2018Making Sense of Vision and Touch: Self-Supervised Learning of Multimodal Representations for Contact-Rich Taskscited by 150
  7. 2018Reinforcement and Imitation Learning for Diverse Visuomotor Skillscited by 124
  8. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning for Industrial Insertion Tasks with Visual Inputs and Natural Rewardscited by 58
  9. 2015Learning Contact-Rich Manipulation Skills with Guided Policy Searchcited by 37
  10. 2017Deep Reinforcement Learning for High Precision Assembly Taskscited by 37
  11. 2018A Practical Approach to Insertion with Variable Socket Position Using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 35
  12. 2019SQIL: Imitation Learning via Reinforcement Learning with Sparse Rewardscited by 28
1 more
  1. 2017Deep Q-learning from Demonstrationscited by 27

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 1; 2022: 3; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.

8 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2019Compare Contact Model-based Control and Contact Model-free Learning: A Survey of Robotic Peg-in-hole Assembly Strategies
  2. 2025Zero-Shot Peg Insertion: Identifying Mating Holes and Estimating SE(2) Poses with Vision-Language Models
  3. 2023Evaluating Robustness of Visual Representations for Object Assembly Task Requiring Spatio-Geometrical Reasoning
  4. 2026SI-Diff: A Framework for Learning Search and High-Precision Insertion with a Force-Domain Diffusion Policy
  5. 2020Imitation Learning for High Precision Peg-in-Hole Tasks
  6. 2024Symmetry-aware Reinforcement Learning for Robotic Assembly under Partial Observability with a Soft Wrist
  7. 2025Towards Forceful Robotic Foundation Models: a Literature Survey
  8. 2021Learning Forceful Manipulation Skills from Multi-modal Human Demonstrations