mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Zero-Shot Peg Insertion: Identifying Mating Holes and Estimating SE(2) Poses with Vision-Language Models

arXiv 2503.06026 ↗First posted 8 Mar 2025cs.RO cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Embodied and 3D vision-language models

Abstract (arXiv)

Achieving zero-shot peg insertion, where inserting an arbitrary peg into an unseen hole without task-specific training, remains a fundamental challenge in robotics. This task demands a highly generalizable perception system capable of detecting potential holes, selecting the correct mating hole from multiple candidates, estimating its precise pose, and executing insertion despite uncertainties. While learning-based methods have been applied to peg insertion, they often fail to generalize beyond the specific peg-hole pairs encountered during training. Recent advancements in Vision-Language Models (VLMs) offer a promising alternative, leveraging large-scale datasets to enable robust generalization across diverse tasks. Inspired by their success, we introduce a novel zero-shot peg insertion framework that utilizes a VLM to identify mating holes and estimate their poses without prior knowledge of their geometry. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method achieves 90.2% accuracy, significantly outperforming baselines in identifying the correct mating hole across a wide range of previously unseen peg-hole pairs, including 3D-printed objects, toy puzzles, and industrial connectors. Furthermore, we validate the effectiveness of our approach in a real-world connector insertion task on a backpanel of a PC, where our system successfully detects holes, identifies the correct mating hole, estimates its pose, and completes the insertion with a success rate of 88.3%. These results highlight the potential of VLM-driven zero-shot reasoning for enabling robust and generalizable robotic assembly.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Embodied and 3D vision-language models, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. Builds on 27 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Mar 2025.

Builds on

27 of 40 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024RL-VLM-F: Reinforcement Learning from Vision Language Foundation Model Feedback6 Feb

Other references · 26

  1. 2024LLaVA-OneVision: Easy Visual Task Transfercited by 2,719
  2. 2024π0: A Vision-Language-Action Flow Model for General Robot Controlcited by 2,407
  3. 2022Do As I Can, Not As I Say: Grounding Language in Robotic Affordancescited by 2,348
  4. 2022Code as Policies: Language Model Programs for Embodied Controlcited by 1,210
  5. 2023Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Surveycited by 839
  6. 2022ProgPrompt: Generating Situated Robot Task Plans using Large Language Modelscited by 611
  7. 2022Perceiver-Actor: A Multi-Task Transformer for Robotic Manipulationcited by 551
  8. 2022BC-Z: Zero-Shot Task Generalization with Robotic Imitation Learningcited by 523
  9. 20163DMatch: Learning Local Geometric Descriptors from RGB-D Reconstructionscited by 336
  10. 2023Fast Segment Anythingcited by 290
  11. 2018Dense Object Nets: Learning Dense Visual Object Descriptors By and For Robotic Manipulationcited by 142
  12. 2019Deep Reinforcement Learning for Industrial Insertion Tasks with Visual Inputs and Natural Rewardscited by 64
14 more
  1. 2024OmniGlue: Generalizable Feature Matching with Foundation Model Guidancecited by 56
  2. 2019Form2Fit: Learning Shape Priors for Generalizable Assembly from Disassemblycited by 51
  3. 2024Matching Anything by Segmenting Anythingcited by 50
  4. 2021Offline Meta-Reinforcement Learning for Industrial Insertioncited by 39
  5. 2021kPAM 2.0: Feedback Control for Category-Level Robotic Manipulationcited by 38
  6. 2022EDTER: Edge Detection with Transformercited by 36
  7. 2019Compare Contact Model-based Control and Contact Model-free Learning: A Survey of Robotic Peg-in-hole Assembly Strategiescited by 14
  8. 2022Learning on the Job: Self-Rewarding Offline-to-Online Finetuning for Industrial Insertion of Novel Connectors from Visioncited by 13
  9. 2018Learning Pose Estimation for High-Precision Robotic Assembly Using Simulated Depth Imagescited by 11
  10. 2020Fast robust peg-in-hole insertion with continuous visual servoingcited by 9
  11. 2019Quickly Inserting Pegs into Uncertain Holes using Multi-view Images and Deep Network Trained on Synthetic Datacited by 6
  12. 2023Tactile-Filter: Interactive Tactile Perception for Part Matingcited by 4
  13. 2024Autonomous Robotic Assembly: From Part Singulation to Precise Assemblycited by 4
  14. 2023CHSEL: Producing Diverse Plausible Pose Estimates from Contact and Free Space Datacited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025A Visual Reinforcement Learning-Based Separate Primitive Policy for Peg-in-Hole Tasks
  2. 2023Evaluating Robustness of Visual Representations for Object Assembly Task Requiring Spatio-Geometrical Reasoning
  3. 2020Understanding Multi-Modal Perception Using Behavioral Cloning for Peg-In-a-Hole Insertion Tasks
  4. 2026TacZero: Training-Free Peg Insertion Using a General-Purpose Vision-Language Model with Tactile Feedback
  5. 2026Generalizable Robotic Insertion with World Models
  6. 2020Imitation Learning for High Precision Peg-in-Hole Tasks
  7. 2026Visual-Tactile Peg-in-Hole Assembly Learning from Peg-out-of-Hole Disassembly ↗
  8. 2023Open-Pose 3D Zero-Shot Learning: Benchmark and Challenges