mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

RAMP: Boosting Adversarial Robustness Against Multiple lp Perturbations for Universal Robustness

arXiv 2402.06827 ↗First posted 9 Feb 2024cs.LG cs.CRcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most existing works focus on improving robustness against adversarial attacks bounded by a single lp norm using adversarial training (AT). However, these AT models' multiple-norm robustness (union accuracy) is still low, which is crucial since in the real-world an adversary is not necessarily bounded by a single norm. The tradeoffs among robustness against multiple lp perturbations and accuracy/robustness make obtaining good union and clean accuracy challenging. We design a logit pairing loss to improve the union accuracy by analyzing the tradeoffs from the lens of distribution shifts. We connect natural training (NT) with AT via gradient projection, to incorporate useful information from NT into AT, where we empirically and theoretically show it moderates the accuracy/robustness tradeoff. We propose a novel training framework RAMP, to boost the robustness against multiple lp perturbations. RAMP can be easily adapted for robust fine-tuning and full AT. For robust fine-tuning, RAMP obtains a union accuracy up to 53.3% on CIFAR-10, and 29.1% on ImageNet. For training from scratch, RAMP achieves a union accuracy of 44.6% and good clean accuracy of 81.2% on ResNet-18 against AutoAttack on CIFAR-10. Beyond multi-norm robustness RAMP-trained models achieve superior textituniversal robustness, effectively generalizing against a range of unseen adversaries and natural corruptions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 40 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Feb 2024.

Builds on

40 of 57 references.

References · 40

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  5. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
  6. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  7. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
  8. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  9. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,451
  10. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 840
  11. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 661
  12. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 416
28 more
  1. 2019Adversarial Examples Improve Image Recognitioncited by 286
  2. 2020Uncovering the Limits of Adversarial Training against Norm-Bounded Adversarial Examplescited by 278
  3. 2018Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 224
  4. 2023Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 208
  5. 2020Geometry-aware Instance-reweighted Adversarial Trainingcited by 198
  6. 2019Adversarial Training and Robustness for Multiple Perturbationscited by 183
  7. 2018Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectorscited by 163
  8. 2020Understanding and Mitigating the Tradeoff Between Robustness and Accuracycited by 149
  9. 2020Perceptual Adversarial Robustness: Defense Against Unseen Threat Modelscited by 137
  10. 2018Towards the first adversarially robust neural network model on MNISTcited by 104
  11. 2019Adversarial Robustness Against the Union of Multiple Perturbation Modelscited by 88
  12. 2017Exploring the Landscape of Spatial Robustnesscited by 81
  13. 2020Sparse-RS: a versatile framework for query-efficient sparse black-box adversarial attackscited by 65
  14. 2021A Winning Hand: Compressing Deep Networks Can Improve Out-Of-Distribution Robustnesscited by 62
  15. 2020Learning perturbation sets for robust machine learningcited by 48
  16. 2023Robust Principles: Architectural Design Principles for Adversarially Robust CNNscited by 46
  17. 2020Batch Normalization Increases Adversarial Vulnerability and Decreases Adversarial Transferability: A Non-Robust Feature Perspectivecited by 35
  18. 2018Evaluating and Understanding the Robustness of Adversarial Logit Pairingcited by 34
  19. 2019Transfer of Adversarial Robustness Between Perturbation Typescited by 25
  20. 2021Adversarial Robustness against Multiple and Single lp-Threat Models via Quick Fine-Tuning of Robust Classifierscited by 23
  21. 2022Explicit Tradeoffs between Adversarial and Natural Distributional Robustnesscited by 20
  22. 2020Learning to Generate Noise for Multi-Attack Robustnesscited by 17
  23. 2021Fundamental Tradeoffs in Distributionally Adversarial Trainingcited by 12
  24. 2022Adaptive Smoothness-weighted Adversarial Training for Multiple Perturbations with Its Stability Analysiscited by 9
  25. 2020Approximate Manifold Defense Against Multiple Adversarial Perturbationscited by 7
  26. 2021Mixture of Robust Experts (MoRE):A Robust Denoising Method towards multiple perturbationscited by 6
  27. 2022Generalizability of Adversarial Robustness Under Distribution Shiftscited by 6
  28. 2023Principled Federated Domain Adaptation: Gradient Projection and Auto-Weightingcited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.