mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

XAI-CLASS: Explanation-Enhanced Text Classification with Extremely Weak Supervision

arXiv 2311.00189 ↗First posted 31 Oct 2023cs.CL cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text classification aims to effectively categorize documents into pre-defined categories. Traditional methods for text classification often rely on large amounts of manually annotated training data, making the process time-consuming and labor-intensive. To address this issue, recent studies have focused on weakly-supervised and extremely weakly-supervised settings, which require minimal or no human annotation, respectively. In previous methods of weakly supervised text classification, pseudo-training data is generated by assigning pseudo-labels to documents based on their alignment (e.g., keyword matching) with specific classes. However, these methods ignore the importance of incorporating the explanations of the generated pseudo-labels, or saliency of individual words, as additional guidance during the text classification training process. To address this limitation, we propose XAI-CLASS, a novel explanation-enhanced extremely weakly-supervised text classification method that incorporates word saliency prediction as an auxiliary task. XAI-CLASS begins by employing a multi-round question-answering process to generate pseudo-training data that promotes the mutual enhancement of class labels and corresponding explanation word generation. This pseudo-training data is then used to train a multi-task framework that simultaneously learns both text classification and word saliency prediction. Extensive experiments on several weakly-supervised text classification datasets show that XAI-CLASS outperforms other weakly-supervised text classification methods significantly. Moreover, experiments demonstrate that XAI-CLASS enhances both model performance and explainability.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Oct 2023.

Builds on

19 of 38 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  2. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,811
  3. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  4. 2015Character-level Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 2,330
  5. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,290
  6. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,127
  7. 2019Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddingscited by 1,002
  8. 2014Striving for Simplicity: The All Convolutional Netcited by 990
  9. 2016Data Programming: Creating Large Training Sets, Quicklycited by 246
  10. 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
  11. 2020A Diagnostic Study of Explainability Techniques for Text Classificationcited by 159
  12. 2018Weakly-Supervised Neural Text Classificationcited by 66
7 more
  1. 2016Investigating the influence of noise and distractors on the interpretation of neural networkscited by 54
  2. 2017Towards better understanding of gradient-based attribution methods for Deep Neural Networkscited by 54
  3. 2020X-Class: Text Classification with Extremely Weak Supervisioncited by 46
  4. 2021Weakly-supervised Text Classification Based on Keyword Graphcited by 25
  5. 2020Learning with Weak Supervision for Email Intent Detectioncited by 17
  6. 2022Weakly Supervised Text Classification using Supervision Signals from a Language Modelcited by 10
  7. 2022Unsupervised Key Event Detection from Massive Text Corporacited by 7

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3.

3 papers.