mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Fairness and Transparency in Recommendation: The Users' Perspective

arXiv 2103.08786 ↗First posted 16 Mar 2021cs.IR cs.AI cs.HCcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Though recommender systems are defined by personalization, recent work has shown the importance of additional, beyond-accuracy objectives, such as fairness. Because users often expect their recommendations to be purely personalized, these new algorithmic objectives must be communicated transparently in a fairness-aware recommender system. While explanation has a long history in recommender systems research, there has been little work that attempts to explain systems that use a fairness objective. Even though the previous work in other branches of AI has explored the use of explanations as a tool to increase fairness, this work has not been focused on recommendation. Here, we consider user perspectives of fairness-aware recommender systems and techniques for enhancing their transparency. We describe the results of an exploratory interview study that investigates user perceptions of fairness, recommender systems, and fairness-aware objectives. We propose three features -- informed by the needs of our participants -- that could improve user understanding of and trust in fairness-aware recommender systems.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Mar 2021.

Builds on

11 of 54 references.

References · 11

  1. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  2. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  3. 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 343
  4. 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
  5. 2017Beyond Parity: Fairness Objectives for Collaborative Filteringcited by 93
  6. 2017Multisided Fairness for Recommendationcited by 69
  7. 2018How Do Fairness Definitions Fare? Examining Public Attitudes Towards Algorithmic Definitions of Fairnesscited by 48
  8. 2020Factors Influencing Perceived Fairness in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Algorithm Outcomes, Development Procedures, and Individual Differencescited by 41
  9. 2018Exploring Author Gender in Book Rating and Recommendationcited by 29
  10. 2020Opportunistic Multi-aspect Fairness through Personalized Re-rankingcited by 11
  11. 2020Exploring User Opinions of Fairness in Recommender Systemscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

10 papers.