Prompting Large Language Models with Human Error Markings for Self-Correcting Machine Translation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
While large language models (LLMs) pre-trained on massive amounts of unpaired language data have reached the state-of-the-art in machine translation (MT) of general domain texts, post-editing (PE) is still required to correct errors and to enhance term translation quality in specialized domains. In this paper we present a pilot study of enhancing translation memories (TM) produced by PE (source segments, machine translations, and reference translations, henceforth called PE-TM) for the needs of correct and consistent term translation in technical domains. We investigate a light-weight two-step scenario where, at inference time, a human translator marks errors in the first translation step, and in a second step a few similar examples are extracted from the PE-TM to prompt an LLM. Our experiment shows that the additional effort of augmenting translations with human error markings guides the LLM to focus on a correction of the marked errors, yielding consistent improvements over automatic PE (APE) and MT from scratch.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Jun 2024.
Builds on
17 of 33 references.
References · 17
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
- 2020COMET: A Neural Framework for MT Evaluationcited by 1,024
- 2023Large Language Models Cannot Self-Correct Reasoning Yetcited by 965
- 2016Bag of Tricks for Efficient Text Classificationcited by 869
- 2023Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategiescited by 236
- 2022Prompting PaLM for Translation: Assessing Strategies and Performancecited by 144
- 2023The unreasonable effectiveness of few-shot learning for machine translationcited by 91
- 2023Dictionary-based Phrase-level Prompting of Large Language Models for Machine Translationcited by 74
- 2023Leveraging GPT-4 for Automatic Translation Post-Editingcited by 56
- 2020Correct Me If You Can: Learning from Error Corrections and Markingscited by 11
5 more
- 2019Interactive-Predictive Neural Machine Translation through Reinforcement and Imitationcited by 7
- 2022Improving Retrieval Augmented Neural Machine Translation by Controlling Source and Fuzzy-Match Interactionscited by 7
- 2018Learning from Chunk-based Feedback in Neural Machine Translationcited by 6
- 2023BLEU Meets COMET: Combining Lexical and Neural Metrics Towards Robust Machine Translation Evaluationcited by 5
- 2023Enhancing Supervised Learning with Contrastive Markings in Neural Machine Translation Trainingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.
- 2025Two Intermediate Translations Are Better Than One: Fine-tuning LLMs for Document-level Translation Refinementcited by 5
- 2025Translation Analytics for Freelancers: I. Introduction, Data Preparation, Baseline Evaluationscited by 2
- 2026Translation Analytics for Freelancers II: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Confidential Translation Workflowscited by 0
- 2026Translation Analytics for Freelancers II: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Confidential Translation Workflows29 May 2026
- 2025Translation Analytics for Freelancers: I. Introduction, Data Preparation, Baseline Evaluations20 Apr 2025
- 2025Two Intermediate Translations Are Better Than One: Fine-tuning LLMs for Document-level Translation Refinement8 Apr 2025