mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Simple Yet Strong Pipeline for HotpotQA

arXiv 2004.06753 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2020cs.CLcited by 24

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

State-of-the-art models for multi-hop question answering typically augment large-scale language models like BERT with additional, intuitively useful capabilities such as named entity recognition, graph-based reasoning, and question decomposition. However, does their strong performance on popular multi-hop datasets really justify this added design complexity? Our results suggest that the answer may be no, because even our simple pipeline based on BERT, named Quark, performs surprisingly well. Specifically, on HotpotQA, Quark outperforms these models on both question answering and support identification (and achieves performance very close to a RoBERTa model). Our pipeline has three steps: 1) use BERT to identify potentially relevant sentences independently of each other; 2) feed the set of selected sentences as context into a standard BERT span prediction model to choose an answer; and 3) use the sentence selection model, now with the chosen answer, to produce supporting sentences. The strong performance of Quark resurfaces the importance of carefully exploring simple model designs before using popular benchmarks to justify the value of complex techniques.

Key facts. Cited by 24 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 10; 2022: 7; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

24 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021MuSiQue: Multihop Questions via Single-hop Question Compositioncited by 893
  2. 2024KAG: Boosting LLMs in Professional Domains via Knowledge Augmented Generationcited by 67
  3. 2021Connecting Attributions and QA Model Behavior on Realistic Counterfactualscited by 20
  4. 2021Robustifying Multi-hop QA through Pseudo-Evidentiality Trainingcited by 13
  5. 2021Graph-free Multi-hop Reading Comprehension: A Select-to-Guide Strategycited by 13
  6. 2022From Easy to Hard: Two-stage Selector and Reader for Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 12
  7. 2025CoAT: Chain-of-Associated-Thoughts Framework for Enhancing Large Language Models Reasoningcited by 11
  8. 2021Mitigating False-Negative Contexts in Multi-document Question Answering with Retrieval Marginalizationcited by 10
  9. 2021Summarize-then-Answer: Generating Concise Explanations for Multi-hop Reading Comprehensioncited by 10
  10. 2023Chain-of-Questions Training with Latent Answers for Robust Multistep Question Answeringcited by 8
  11. 2022Beyond the Granularity: Multi-Perspective Dialogue Collaborative Selection for Dialogue State Trackingcited by 6
  12. 2022Counterfactual Multihop QA: A Cause-Effect Approach for Reducing Disconnected Reasoningcited by 6
12 more
  1. 2021A Survey on non-English Question Answering Datasetcited by 5
  2. 2023HOP, UNION, GENERATE: Explainable Multi-hop Reasoning without Rationale Supervisioncited by 5
  3. 2021A Simple Approach to Jointly Rank Passages and Select Relevant Sentences in the OBQA Contextcited by 4
  4. 2022Rethinking Label Smoothing on Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 4
  5. 2021Classification of Goods Using Text Descriptions With Sentences Retrievalcited by 3
  6. 2021Towards Interpretable and Reliable Reading Comprehension: A Pipeline Model with Unanswerability Predictioncited by 3
  7. 2022QA4QG: Using Question Answering to Constrain Multi-Hop Question Generationcited by 3
  8. 2022Better Retrieval May Not Lead to Better Question Answeringcited by 3
  9. 2023Explainable Product Classification for Customscited by 2
  10. 2023Uncertainty Guided Global Memory Improves Multi-Hop Question Answeringcited by 2
  11. 2022Relational Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Multihop Reasoning: A Comparative Studycited by 1
  12. 2025Bactrainus: Optimizing Large Language Models for Multi-hop Complex Question Answering Taskscited by 1