Summarize-then-Answer: Generating Concise Explanations for Multi-hop Reading Comprehension
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
How can we generate concise explanations for multi-hop Reading Comprehension (RC)? The current strategies of identifying supporting sentences can be seen as an extractive question-focused summarization of the input text. However, these extractive explanations are not necessarily concise i.e. not minimally sufficient for answering a question. Instead, we advocate for an abstractive approach, where we propose to generate a question-focused, abstractive summary of input paragraphs and then feed it to an RC system. Given a limited amount of human-annotated abstractive explanations, we train the abstractive explainer in a semi-supervised manner, where we start from the supervised model and then train it further through trial and error maximizing a conciseness-promoted reward function. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed abstractive explainer can generate more compact explanations than an extractive explainer with limited supervision (only 2k instances) while maintaining sufficiency.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Sep 2021.
Builds on
29 of 38 references.
References · 29
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,874
- 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
- 2020REALM: Retrieval-Augmented Language Model Pre-Trainingcited by 2,126
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
- 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
- 2016Self-critical Sequence Training for Image Captioningcited by 544
- 2019ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Modelscited by 523
- 2020UnifiedQA: Crossing Format Boundaries With a Single QA Systemcited by 475
- 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
17 more
- 2019Explain Yourself! Leveraging Language Models for Commonsense Reasoningcited by 367
- 2020Re-evaluating Evaluation in Text Summarizationcited by 144
- 2021Teach Me to Explain: A Review of Datasets for Explainable Natural Language Processingcited by 126
- 2020NILE : Natural Language Inference with Faithful Natural Language Explanationscited by 96
- 2020Pre-trained Summarization Distillationcited by 70
- 2020An Information Bottleneck Approach for Controlling Conciseness in Rationale Extractioncited by 69
- 2018WorldTree: A Corpus of Explanation Graphs for Elementary Science Questions supporting Multi-Hop Inferencecited by 60
- 2019Select, Answer and Explain: Interpretable Multi-hop Reading Comprehension over Multiple Documentscited by 57
- 2017Diversity driven Attention Model for Query-based Abstractive Summarizationcited by 42
- 2019R4C: A Benchmark for Evaluating RC Systems to Get the Right Answer for the Right Reasoncited by 36
- 2020Explaining Question Answering Models through Text Generationcited by 33
- 2020A Survey on Explainability in Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 33
- 2020A Simple Yet Strong Pipeline for HotpotQAcited by 24
- 2020Unsupervised Alignment-based Iterative Evidence Retrieval for Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 24
- 2021Data Augmentation for Abstractive Query-Focused Multi-Document Summarizationcited by 18
- 2020Why do you think that? Exploring Faithful Sentence-Level Rationales Without Supervisioncited by 15
- 2020Dense-Caption Matching and Frame-Selection Gating for Temporal Localization in VideoQAcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 4; 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
10 papers.
- 2023Natural Language Reasoning, A Surveycited by 61
- 2023EX-FEVER: A Dataset for Multi-hop Explainable Fact Verificationcited by 36
- 2022Modeling Multi-hop Question Answering as Single Sequence Predictioncited by 21
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Self-Interpretable Neural Networkscited by 18
- 2022Salience Allocation as Guidance for Abstractive Summarizationcited by 14
- 2022Explanation Regeneration via Information Bottleneckcited by 4
- 2023Situated Natural Language Explanationscited by 2
- 2023Explanation Graph Generation via Generative Pre-training over Synthetic Graphscited by 1
- 2024Context Filtering with Reward Modeling in Question Answeringcited by 1
- 2022U3E: Unsupervised and Erasure-based Evidence Extraction for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 0
- 2025A Comprehensive Survey on Self-Interpretable Neural Networks26 Jan 2025
- 2024Context Filtering with Reward Modeling in Question Answering16 Dec 2024
- 2023EX-FEVER: A Dataset for Multi-hop Explainable Fact Verification15 Oct 2023
- 2023Situated Natural Language Explanations27 Aug 2023
- 2023Explanation Graph Generation via Generative Pre-training over Synthetic Graphs1 Jun 2023
- 2023Natural Language Reasoning, A Survey26 Mar 2023
- 2022Explanation Regeneration via Information Bottleneck19 Dec 2022
- 2022Salience Allocation as Guidance for Abstractive Summarization22 Oct 2022
- 2022U3E: Unsupervised and Erasure-based Evidence Extraction for Machine Reading Comprehension6 Oct 2022
- 2022Modeling Multi-hop Question Answering as Single Sequence Prediction18 May 2022