mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

BARK: Open Behavior Benchmarking in Multi-Agent Environments

arXiv 2003.02604 ↗First posted 5 Mar 2020cs.MAcited by 21

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Predicting and planning interactive behaviors in complex traffic situations presents a challenging task. Especially in scenarios involving multiple traffic participants that interact densely, autonomous vehicles still struggle to interpret situations and to eventually achieve their own mission goal. As driving tests are costly and challenging scenarios are hard to find and reproduce, simulation is widely used to develop, test, and benchmark behavior models. However, most simulations rely on datasets and simplistic behavior models for traffic participants and do not cover the full variety of real-world, interactive human behaviors. In this work, we introduce BARK, an open-source behavior benchmarking environment designed to mitigate the shortcomings stated above. In BARK, behavior models are (re-)used for planning, prediction, and simulation. A range of models is currently available, such as Monte-Carlo Tree Search and Reinforcement Learning-based behavior models. We use a public dataset and sampling-based scenario generation to show the inter-exchangeability of behavior models in BARK. We evaluate how well the models used cope with interactions and how robust they are towards exchanging behavior models. Our evaluation shows that BARK provides a suitable framework for a systematic development of behavior models.

Key facts. Cited by 21 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 5 Mar 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2021: 4; 2022: 5; 2023: 5; 2024: 6; 2025: 1.

21 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2024Bench2Drive: Towards Multi-Ability Benchmarking of Closed-Loop End-To-End Autonomous Drivingcited by 250
  2. 2023The Waymo Open Sim Agents Challengecited by 86
  3. 2022Nocturne: a scalable driving benchmark for bringing multi-agent learning one step closer to the real worldcited by 56
  4. 2024Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Autonomous Driving: A Surveycited by 30
  5. 2023Rethinking Closed-loop Training for Autonomous Drivingcited by 29
  6. 2023Choose Your Simulator Wisely: A Review on Open-source Simulators for Autonomous Drivingcited by 26
  7. 2022TrajGen: Generating Realistic and Diverse Trajectories with Reactive and Feasible Agent Behaviors for Autonomous Drivingcited by 23
  8. 2023What Truly Matters in Trajectory Prediction for Autonomous Driving?cited by 17
  9. 2022An Introduction to Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning and Review of its Application to Autonomous Mobilitycited by 16
  10. 2024Learning to Drive via Asymmetric Self-Playcited by 11
  11. 2021TIP: Task-Informed Motion Prediction for Intelligent Vehiclescited by 8
  12. 2022RITA: Boost Driving Simulators with Realistic Interactive Traffic Flowcited by 7
9 more
  1. 2021A Reinforcement Learning Benchmark for Autonomous Driving in Intersection Scenarioscited by 4
  2. 2024Investigating Driving Interactions: A Robust Multi-Agent Simulation Framework for Autonomous Vehiclescited by 3
  3. 2024Scenario-Based Curriculum Generation for Multi-Agent Autonomous Drivingcited by 3
  4. 2024Adversarial and Reactive Traffic Entities for Behavior-Realistic Driving Simulation: A Reviewcited by 3
  5. 2025Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning in Intelligent Transportation Systems: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 2
  6. 2021Risk-Constrained Interactive Safety under Behavior Uncertainty for Autonomous Drivingcited by 1
  7. 2022P4P: Conflict-Aware Motion Prediction for Planning in Autonomous Drivingcited by 1
  8. 2023Demonstration-guided Deep Reinforcement Learning for Coordinated Ramp Metering and Perimeter Control in Large Scale Networkscited by 1
  9. 2021A Utility Maximization Model of Pedestrian and Driver Interactionscited by 0