mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

NASDAQ: Normalized Observation Space Dynamics-Augmented Q-Learning

arXiv 2606.21297 ↗First posted 19 Jun 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Augmenting model-free reinforcement learning (RL) with representations learned through observation dynamics prediction (observation-predictive RL) can improve sample efficiency and performance, with minor modifications and limited additional computation. However, this approach still struggles in challenging tasks with low-dimensional observations. In this paper, we identify a key factor behind this problem: unbalanced reconstruction losses across observation dimensions, where dimensions with larger value ranges dominate the loss. This encourages the agent to neglect dimensions with relatively small ranges, leading to degraded performance. To address this issue, we propose a novel normalization method tailored to online RL, which normalizes low-dimensional observations and balances the resulting losses and gradients. Beyond balancing reconstruction losses, observation normalization enables dynamics prediction to be performed in a normalized observation space, thereby providing a unified treatment of low- and high-dimensional inputs (e.g., physical states and images). Building on this idea, we further introduce Normalized Observation Space Dynamics-Augmented Q-learning (NASDAQ), a framework for observation-predictive RL applicable across diverse domains. NASDAQ learns state-action representations by coupling value learning with two auxiliary tasks: short-term value prediction and next normalized observation prediction. Extensive experiments demonstrate that NASDAQ achieves competitive or superior performance compared with state-of-the-art model-based and self-predictive RL methods, while requiring significantly less training wall-time.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jun 2026.

Builds on

31 of 53 references.

References · 31

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  4. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  5. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
  6. 2018Addressing Function Approximation Error in Actor-Critic Methodscited by 2,302
  7. 2018Spectral Normalization for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 1,618
  8. 2019Dream to Control: Learning Behaviors by Latent Imaginationcited by 1,598
  9. 2017Multi-Agent Actor-Critic for Mixed Cooperative-Competitive Environmentscited by 1,519
  10. 2019Mastering Atari, Go, Chess and Shogi by Planning with a Learned Modelcited by 1,327
  11. 2023Mastering Diverse Domains through World Modelscited by 1,193
  12. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
19 more
  1. 2018DeepMind Control Suitecited by 935
  2. 2017Rainbow: Combining Improvements in Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 774
  3. 2015Dueling Network Architectures for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 769
  4. 2020Image Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from Pixelscited by 573
  5. 2023TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Controlcited by 482
  6. 2022Temporal Difference Learning for Model Predictive Controlcited by 375
  7. 2021Mastering Visual Continuous Control: Improved Data-Augmented Reinforcement Learningcited by 359
  8. 2020Data-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Self-Predictive Representationscited by 309
  9. 2020Bootstrap Latent-Predictive Representations for Multitask Reinforcement Learningcited by 101
  10. 2023For SALE: State-Action Representation Learning for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 73
  11. 2021Spectral Normalisation for Deep Reinforcement Learning: an Optimisation Perspectivecited by 64
  12. 2024Bridging State and History Representations: Understanding Self-Predictive RLcited by 52
  13. 2020An Equivalence between Loss Functions and Non-Uniform Sampling in Experience Replaycited by 41
  14. 2025Towards General-Purpose Model-Free Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  15. 2020Can Increasing Input Dimensionality Improve Deep Reinforcement Learning?cited by 37
  16. 2021Is High Variance Unavoidable in RL? A Case Study in Continuous Controlcited by 26
  17. 2018Decoupling Dynamics and Reward for Transfer Learningcited by 23
  18. 2023Normalization Enhances Generalization in Visual Reinforcement Learningcited by 13
  19. 2024When does Self-Prediction help? Understanding Auxiliary Tasks in Reinforcement Learningcited by 13

Built on by

Not cited yet.