mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Machine learning enables completely automatic tuning of a quantum device faster than human experts

arXiv 2001.02589 ↗First posted 8 Jan 2020cond-mat.mes-hall cs.LG quant-phcited by 23

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Device variability is a bottleneck for the scalability of semiconductor quantum devices. Increasing device control comes at the cost of a large parameter space that has to be explored in order to find the optimal operating conditions. We demonstrate a statistical tuning algorithm that navigates this entire parameter space, using just a few modelling assumptions, in the search for specific electron transport features. We focused on gate-defined quantum dot devices, demonstrating fully automated tuning of two different devices to double quantum dot regimes in an up to eight-dimensional gate voltage space. We considered a parameter space defined by the maximum range of each gate voltage in these devices, demonstrating expected tuning in under 70 minutes. This performance exceeded a human benchmark, although we recognise that there is room for improvement in the performance of both humans and machines. Our approach is approximately 180 times faster than a pure random search of the parameter space, and it is readily applicable to different material systems and device architectures. With an efficient navigation of the gate voltage space we are able to give a quantitative measurement of device variability, from one device to another and after a thermal cycle of a device. This is a key demonstration of the use of machine learning techniques to explore and optimise the parameter space of quantum devices and overcome the challenge of device variability.

Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 13 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

23 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022On scientific understanding with artificial intelligencecited by 68
  2. 2024Qiskit Code Assistant: Training LLMs for generating Quantum Computing Codecited by 24
  3. 2021Colloquium: Advances in automation of quantum dot devices controlcited by 18
  4. 2021Ray-based framework for state identification in quantum dot devicescited by 17
  5. 2022Tuning arrays with rays: Physics-informed tuning of quantum dot charge statescited by 16
  6. 2021Toward Robust Autotuning of Noisy Quantum Dot Devicescited by 13
  7. 2023Automated extraction of capacitive coupling for quantum dot systemscited by 11
  8. 2021Cross-architecture Tuning of Silicon and SiGe-based Quantum Devices Using Machine Learningcited by 7
  9. 2024Fully autonomous tuning of a spin qubitcited by 7
  10. 2021Bridging the reality gap in quantum devices with physics-aware machine learningcited by 6
  11. 2023Data needs and challenges for quantum dot devices automationcited by 6
  12. 2021Theoretical bounds on data requirements for the ray-based classificationcited by 4
11 more
  1. 2024Autonomous Bootstrapping of Quantum Dot Devicescited by 4
  2. 2022Identifying Pauli spin blockade using deep learningcited by 3
  3. 2024Quantum Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Surveycited by 3
  4. 2025QDFlow: A Python package for physics simulations of quantum dot devicescited by 2
  5. 2025Automated electrostatic characterization of quantum dot devices in single- and bilayer heterostructurescited by 2
  6. 2022Machine learning optimization of Majorana hybrid nanowirescited by 1
  7. 2023Topological gap protocol based machine learning optimization of Majorana hybrid wirescited by 0
  8. 2024Robust quantum dots charge autotuning using neural network uncertaintycited by 0
  9. 2024Modular Autonomous Virtualization System for Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Quantum Dot Arrayscited by 0
  10. 2026Action-Factored Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Scalable Quantum Device Tuningcited by 0
  11. 2026Evaluating Verified Autonomy in Quantum Engineeringcited by 0