Machine learning enables completely automatic tuning of a quantum device faster than human experts
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Device variability is a bottleneck for the scalability of semiconductor quantum devices. Increasing device control comes at the cost of a large parameter space that has to be explored in order to find the optimal operating conditions. We demonstrate a statistical tuning algorithm that navigates this entire parameter space, using just a few modelling assumptions, in the search for specific electron transport features. We focused on gate-defined quantum dot devices, demonstrating fully automated tuning of two different devices to double quantum dot regimes in an up to eight-dimensional gate voltage space. We considered a parameter space defined by the maximum range of each gate voltage in these devices, demonstrating expected tuning in under 70 minutes. This performance exceeded a human benchmark, although we recognise that there is room for improvement in the performance of both humans and machines. Our approach is approximately 180 times faster than a pure random search of the parameter space, and it is readily applicable to different material systems and device architectures. With an efficient navigation of the gate voltage space we are able to give a quantitative measurement of device variability, from one device to another and after a thermal cycle of a device. This is a key demonstration of the use of machine learning techniques to explore and optimise the parameter space of quantum devices and overcome the challenge of device variability.
Key facts. Cited by 23 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 8 Jan 2020.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 6; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
23 papers.
Sort:
- 2022On scientific understanding with artificial intelligencecited by 68
- 2024Qiskit Code Assistant: Training LLMs for generating Quantum Computing Codecited by 24
- 2021Colloquium: Advances in automation of quantum dot devices controlcited by 18
- 2021Ray-based framework for state identification in quantum dot devicescited by 17
- 2022Tuning arrays with rays: Physics-informed tuning of quantum dot charge statescited by 16
- 2021Toward Robust Autotuning of Noisy Quantum Dot Devicescited by 13
- 2023Automated extraction of capacitive coupling for quantum dot systemscited by 11
- 2021Cross-architecture Tuning of Silicon and SiGe-based Quantum Devices Using Machine Learningcited by 7
- 2024Fully autonomous tuning of a spin qubitcited by 7
- 2021Bridging the reality gap in quantum devices with physics-aware machine learningcited by 6
- 2023Data needs and challenges for quantum dot devices automationcited by 6
- 2021Theoretical bounds on data requirements for the ray-based classificationcited by 4
11 more
- 2024Autonomous Bootstrapping of Quantum Dot Devicescited by 4
- 2022Identifying Pauli spin blockade using deep learningcited by 3
- 2024Quantum Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Surveycited by 3
- 2025QDFlow: A Python package for physics simulations of quantum dot devicescited by 2
- 2025Automated electrostatic characterization of quantum dot devices in single- and bilayer heterostructurescited by 2
- 2022Machine learning optimization of Majorana hybrid nanowirescited by 1
- 2023Topological gap protocol based machine learning optimization of Majorana hybrid wirescited by 0
- 2024Robust quantum dots charge autotuning using neural network uncertaintycited by 0
- 2024Modular Autonomous Virtualization System for Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Quantum Dot Arrayscited by 0
- 2026Action-Factored Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Scalable Quantum Device Tuningcited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Verified Autonomy in Quantum Engineeringcited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Verified Autonomy in Quantum Engineering15 Sep 2026
- 2026Action-Factored Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Scalable Quantum Device Tuning10 Jul 2026
- 2025Automated electrostatic characterization of quantum dot devices in single- and bilayer heterostructures31 Dec 2025
- 2025QDFlow: A Python package for physics simulations of quantum dot devices16 Sep 2025
- 2024Modular Autonomous Virtualization System for Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Quantum Dot Arrays19 Nov 2024
- 2024Quantum Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey20 Aug 2024
- 2024Autonomous Bootstrapping of Quantum Dot Devices29 Jul 2024
- 2024Robust quantum dots charge autotuning using neural network uncertainty7 Jun 2024
- 2024Qiskit Code Assistant: Training LLMs for generating Quantum Computing Code29 May 2024
- 2024Fully autonomous tuning of a spin qubit6 Feb 2024
- 2023Data needs and challenges for quantum dot devices automation21 Dec 2023
- 2023Topological gap protocol based machine learning optimization of Majorana hybrid wires25 May 2023
11 more
- 2023Automated extraction of capacitive coupling for quantum dot systems20 Jan 2023
- 2022Tuning arrays with rays: Physics-informed tuning of quantum dot charge states8 Sep 2022
- 2022Machine learning optimization of Majorana hybrid nanowires3 Aug 2022
- 2022On scientific understanding with artificial intelligence4 Apr 2022
- 2022Identifying Pauli spin blockade using deep learning1 Feb 2022
- 2021Colloquium: Advances in automation of quantum dot devices control17 Dec 2021
- 2021Bridging the reality gap in quantum devices with physics-aware machine learning22 Nov 2021
- 2021Toward Robust Autotuning of Noisy Quantum Dot Devices30 Jul 2021
- 2021Cross-architecture Tuning of Silicon and SiGe-based Quantum Devices Using Machine Learning27 Jul 2021
- 2021Theoretical bounds on data requirements for the ray-based classification17 Mar 2021
- 2021Ray-based framework for state identification in quantum dot devices23 Feb 2021
- 2022On scientific understanding with artificial intelligencecited by 68
- 2024Qiskit Code Assistant: Training LLMs for generating Quantum Computing Codecited by 24
- 2021Colloquium: Advances in automation of quantum dot devices controlcited by 18
- 2021Ray-based framework for state identification in quantum dot devicescited by 17
- 2022Tuning arrays with rays: Physics-informed tuning of quantum dot charge statescited by 16
- 2021Toward Robust Autotuning of Noisy Quantum Dot Devicescited by 13
- 2023Automated extraction of capacitive coupling for quantum dot systemscited by 11
- 2021Cross-architecture Tuning of Silicon and SiGe-based Quantum Devices Using Machine Learningcited by 7
- 2024Fully autonomous tuning of a spin qubitcited by 7
- 2021Bridging the reality gap in quantum devices with physics-aware machine learningcited by 6
- 2023Data needs and challenges for quantum dot devices automationcited by 6
- 2021Theoretical bounds on data requirements for the ray-based classificationcited by 4
12 most cited of 23 All 23 (JSON)
- 2026Evaluating Verified Autonomy in Quantum Engineering15 Sep 2026
- 2026Action-Factored Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Scalable Quantum Device Tuning10 Jul 2026
- 2025Automated electrostatic characterization of quantum dot devices in single- and bilayer heterostructures31 Dec 2025
- 2025QDFlow: A Python package for physics simulations of quantum dot devices16 Sep 2025
- 2024Modular Autonomous Virtualization System for Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Quantum Dot Arrays19 Nov 2024
- 2024Quantum Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Survey20 Aug 2024
- 2024Autonomous Bootstrapping of Quantum Dot Devices29 Jul 2024
- 2024Robust quantum dots charge autotuning using neural network uncertainty7 Jun 2024
- 2024Qiskit Code Assistant: Training LLMs for generating Quantum Computing Code29 May 2024
- 2024Fully autonomous tuning of a spin qubit6 Feb 2024
- 2023Data needs and challenges for quantum dot devices automation21 Dec 2023
- 2023Topological gap protocol based machine learning optimization of Majorana hybrid wires25 May 2023
12 newest of 23 All 23 (JSON)