Ray-based framework for state identification in quantum dot devices
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Quantum dots (QDs) defined with electrostatic gates are a leading platform for a scalable quantum computing implementation. However, with increasing numbers of qubits, the complexity of the control parameter space also grows. Traditional measurement techniques, relying on complete or near-complete exploration via two-parameter scans (images) of the device response, quickly become impractical with increasing numbers of gates. Here we propose to circumvent this challenge by introducing a measurement technique relying on one-dimensional projections of the device response in the multidimensional parameter space. Dubbed the ``ray-based classification (RBC) framework,'' we use this machine learning approach to implement a classifier for QD states, enabling automated recognition of qubit-relevant parameter regimes. We show that RBC surpasses the 82 % accuracy benchmark from the experimental implementation of image-based classification techniques from prior work while reducing the number of measurement points needed by up to 70 %. The reduction in measurement cost is a significant gain for time-intensive QD measurements and is a step forward toward the scalability of these devices. We also discuss how the RBC-based optimizer, which tunes the device to a multiqubit regime, performs when tuning in the two-dimensional and three-dimensional parameter spaces defined by plunger and barrier gates that control the QDs.This work provides experimental validation of both efficient state identification and optimization with machine learning techniques for non-traditional measurements in quantum systems with high-dimensional parameter spaces and time-intensive measurements.
Key facts. Cited by 17 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Feb 2021.
Builds on
4 of 45 references.
References · 4
- 2020Machine learning enables completely automatic tuning of a quantum device faster than human expertscited by 23
- 2020Quantum device fine-tuning using unsupervised embedding learningcited by 14
- 2020Ray-based classification framework for high-dimensional datacited by 10
- 2018Efficiently measuring a quantum device using machine learningcited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 3; 2022: 3; 2023: 3; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.
17 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2021Colloquium: Advances in automation of quantum dot devices controlcited by 18
- 2022Tuning arrays with rays: Physics-informed tuning of quantum dot charge statescited by 16
- 2023Automated extraction of capacitive coupling for quantum dot systemscited by 11
- 2024Fully autonomous tuning of a spin qubitcited by 7
- 2023Data needs and challenges for quantum dot devices automationcited by 6
- 2021Theoretical bounds on data requirements for the ray-based classificationcited by 4
- 2024Autonomous Bootstrapping of Quantum Dot Devicescited by 4
- 2021Estimation of Convex Polytopes for Automatic Discovery of Charge State Transitions in Quantum Dot Arrayscited by 3
- 2022Identifying Pauli spin blockade using deep learningcited by 3
- 2025End-to-End Analysis of Charge Stability Diagrams with Transformerscited by 3
- 2022Learning Coulomb Diamonds in Large Quantum Dot Arrayscited by 2
- 2025QDFlow: A Python package for physics simulations of quantum dot devicescited by 2
5 more
- 2025Automated electrostatic characterization of quantum dot devices in single- and bilayer heterostructurescited by 2
- 2023QDA2: A principled approach to automatically annotating charge stability diagramscited by 1
- 2024Modular Autonomous Virtualization System for Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Quantum Dot Arrayscited by 0
- 2024Bootstrapping, autonomous testing, and initialization system for Si/SixGe1-x multi-quantum-dot devicescited by 0
- 2026Reconstructing Quantum Dot Charge Stability Diagrams with Diffusion Modelscited by 0
- 2026Reconstructing Quantum Dot Charge Stability Diagrams with Diffusion Models27 Mar 2026
- 2025Automated electrostatic characterization of quantum dot devices in single- and bilayer heterostructures31 Dec 2025
- 2025QDFlow: A Python package for physics simulations of quantum dot devices16 Sep 2025
- 2025End-to-End Analysis of Charge Stability Diagrams with Transformers21 Aug 2025
- 2024Bootstrapping, autonomous testing, and initialization system for Si/SixGe1-x multi-quantum-dot devices10 Dec 2024
- 2024Modular Autonomous Virtualization System for Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Quantum Dot Arrays19 Nov 2024
- 2024Autonomous Bootstrapping of Quantum Dot Devices29 Jul 2024
- 2024Fully autonomous tuning of a spin qubit6 Feb 2024
- 2023Data needs and challenges for quantum dot devices automation21 Dec 2023
- 2023QDA2: A principled approach to automatically annotating charge stability diagrams18 Dec 2023
- 2023Automated extraction of capacitive coupling for quantum dot systems20 Jan 2023
- 2022Tuning arrays with rays: Physics-informed tuning of quantum dot charge states8 Sep 2022
5 more
- 2022Learning Coulomb Diamonds in Large Quantum Dot Arrays3 May 2022
- 2022Identifying Pauli spin blockade using deep learning1 Feb 2022
- 2021Colloquium: Advances in automation of quantum dot devices control17 Dec 2021
- 2021Estimation of Convex Polytopes for Automatic Discovery of Charge State Transitions in Quantum Dot Arrays20 Aug 2021
- 2021Theoretical bounds on data requirements for the ray-based classification17 Mar 2021
- 2021Colloquium: Advances in automation of quantum dot devices controlcited by 18
- 2022Tuning arrays with rays: Physics-informed tuning of quantum dot charge statescited by 16
- 2023Automated extraction of capacitive coupling for quantum dot systemscited by 11
- 2024Fully autonomous tuning of a spin qubitcited by 7
- 2023Data needs and challenges for quantum dot devices automationcited by 6
- 2021Theoretical bounds on data requirements for the ray-based classificationcited by 4
- 2024Autonomous Bootstrapping of Quantum Dot Devicescited by 4
- 2021Estimation of Convex Polytopes for Automatic Discovery of Charge State Transitions in Quantum Dot Arrayscited by 3
- 2022Identifying Pauli spin blockade using deep learningcited by 3
- 2025End-to-End Analysis of Charge Stability Diagrams with Transformerscited by 3
- 2022Learning Coulomb Diamonds in Large Quantum Dot Arrayscited by 2
- 2025QDFlow: A Python package for physics simulations of quantum dot devicescited by 2
12 most cited of 16 All 16 (JSON)
- 2025Automated electrostatic characterization of quantum dot devices in single- and bilayer heterostructures31 Dec 2025
- 2025QDFlow: A Python package for physics simulations of quantum dot devices16 Sep 2025
- 2025End-to-End Analysis of Charge Stability Diagrams with Transformers21 Aug 2025
- 2024Bootstrapping, autonomous testing, and initialization system for Si/SixGe1-x multi-quantum-dot devices10 Dec 2024
- 2024Modular Autonomous Virtualization System for Two-Dimensional Semiconductor Quantum Dot Arrays19 Nov 2024
- 2024Autonomous Bootstrapping of Quantum Dot Devices29 Jul 2024
- 2024Fully autonomous tuning of a spin qubit6 Feb 2024
- 2023Data needs and challenges for quantum dot devices automation21 Dec 2023
- 2023QDA2: A principled approach to automatically annotating charge stability diagrams18 Dec 2023
- 2023Automated extraction of capacitive coupling for quantum dot systems20 Jan 2023
- 2022Tuning arrays with rays: Physics-informed tuning of quantum dot charge states8 Sep 2022
- 2022Learning Coulomb Diamonds in Large Quantum Dot Arrays3 May 2022
12 newest of 16 All 16 (JSON)