Theoretical bounds on data requirements for the ray-based classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The problem of classifying high-dimensional shapes in real-world data grows in complexity as the dimension of the space increases. For the case of identifying convex shapes of different geometries, a new classification framework has recently been proposed in which the intersections of a set of one-dimensional representations, called rays, with the boundaries of the shape are used to identify the specific geometry. This ray-based classification (RBC) has been empirically verified using a synthetic dataset of two- and three-dimensional shapes (Zwolak et al. in Proceedings of Third Workshop on Machine Learning and the Physical Sciences (NeurIPS 2020), Vancouver, Canada [December 11, 2020], arXiv:2010.00500, 2020) and, more recently, has also been validated experimentally (Zwolak et al., PRX Quantum 2:020335, 2021). Here, we establish a bound on the number of rays necessary for shape classification, defined by key angular metrics, for arbitrary convex shapes. For two dimensions, we derive a lower bound on the number of rays in terms of the shape's length, diameter, and exterior angles. For convex polytopes in ℝN, we generalize this result to a similar bound given as a function of the dihedral angle and the geometrical parameters of polygonal faces. This result enables a different approach for estimating high-dimensional shapes using substantially fewer data elements than volumetric or surface-based approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Mar 2021.
Builds on
10 of 43 references.
References · 10
- 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,223
- 2020PatchNets: Patch-Based Generalizable Deep Implicit 3D Shape Representationscited by 81
- 2020Learning to Segment 3D Point Clouds in 2D Image Spacecited by 24
- 2020Machine learning enables completely automatic tuning of a quantum device faster than human expertscited by 23
- 2021Ray-based framework for state identification in quantum dot devicescited by 17
- 2020Quantum device fine-tuning using unsupervised embedding learningcited by 14
- 2020Ray-based classification framework for high-dimensional datacited by 10
- 20173D Object Classification via Spherical Projectionscited by 9
- 2018Efficiently measuring a quantum device using machine learningcited by 9
- 2019RGB-D image-based Object Detection: from Traditional Methods to Deep Learning Techniquescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 1; 2023: 1.
4 papers.
- 2021Colloquium: Advances in automation of quantum dot devices controlcited by 18
- 2021Estimation of Convex Polytopes for Automatic Discovery of Charge State Transitions in Quantum Dot Arrayscited by 3
- 2022Learning Coulomb Diamonds in Large Quantum Dot Arrayscited by 2
- 2023QDA2: A principled approach to automatically annotating charge stability diagramscited by 1
- 2023QDA2: A principled approach to automatically annotating charge stability diagrams18 Dec 2023
- 2022Learning Coulomb Diamonds in Large Quantum Dot Arrays3 May 2022
- 2021Colloquium: Advances in automation of quantum dot devices control17 Dec 2021
- 2021Estimation of Convex Polytopes for Automatic Discovery of Charge State Transitions in Quantum Dot Arrays20 Aug 2021