Bridging the reality gap in quantum devices with physics-aware machine learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The discrepancies between reality and simulation impede the optimisation and scalability of solid-state quantum devices. Disorder induced by the unpredictable distribution of material defects is one of the major contributions to the reality gap. We bridge this gap using physics-aware machine learning, in particular, using an approach combining a physical model, deep learning, Gaussian random field, and Bayesian inference. This approach has enabled us to infer the disorder potential of a nanoscale electronic device from electron transport data. This inference is validated by verifying the algorithm's predictions about the gate voltage values required for a laterally-defined quantum dot device in AlGaAs/GaAs to produce current features corresponding to a double quantum dot regime.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Nov 2021.
Builds on
11 of 47 references.
References · 11
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2017Sim-to-Real Transfer of Robotic Control with Dynamics Randomizationcited by 616
- 2018Training Deep Networks with Synthetic Data: Bridging the Reality Gap by Domain Randomizationcited by 292
- 2016Variational Fourier features for Gaussian processescited by 85
- 2018Random Fourier Features for Kernel Ridge Regression: Approximation Bounds and Statistical Guaranteescited by 71
- 2016Understanding Probabilistic Sparse Gaussian Process Approximationscited by 68
- 2015Optimal Rates for Random Fourier Featurescited by 38
- 2019Global optimization of dielectric metasurfaces using a physics-driven neural networkcited by 30
- 2020Machine learning enables completely automatic tuning of a quantum device faster than human expertscited by 23
- 2017Efficient acquisition rules for model-based approximate Bayesian computationcited by 16
- 2017Deep learning and the Schr"odinger equationcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
6 papers.
- 2024Fully autonomous tuning of a spin qubitcited by 7
- 2025Quantum computing and artificial intelligence: status and perspectivescited by 5
- 2022Identifying Pauli spin blockade using deep learningcited by 3
- 2025End-to-End Analysis of Charge Stability Diagrams with Transformerscited by 3
- 2022Machine learning optimization of Majorana hybrid nanowirescited by 1
- 2023Topological gap protocol based machine learning optimization of Majorana hybrid wirescited by 0
- 2025End-to-End Analysis of Charge Stability Diagrams with Transformers21 Aug 2025
- 2025Quantum computing and artificial intelligence: status and perspectives29 May 2025
- 2024Fully autonomous tuning of a spin qubit6 Feb 2024
- 2023Topological gap protocol based machine learning optimization of Majorana hybrid wires25 May 2023
- 2022Machine learning optimization of Majorana hybrid nanowires3 Aug 2022
- 2022Identifying Pauli spin blockade using deep learning1 Feb 2022