Robust quantum dots charge autotuning using neural network uncertainty
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This study presents a machine-learning-based procedure to automate the charge tuning of semiconductor spin qubits with minimal human intervention, addressing one of the significant challenges in scaling up quantum dot technologies. This method exploits artificial neural networks to identify noisy transition lines in stability diagrams, guiding a robust exploration strategy leveraging neural networks' uncertainty estimations. Tested across three distinct offline experimental datasets representing different single quantum dot technologies, the approach achieves over 99% tuning success rate in optimal cases, where more than 10% of the success is directly attributable to uncertainty exploitation. The challenging constraints of small training sets containing high diagram-to-diagram variability allowed us to evaluate the capabilities and limits of the proposed procedure.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 102 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jun 2024.
Builds on
30 of 102 references.
References · 30
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,960
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,385
- 2020A Review of Uncertainty Quantification in Deep Learning: Techniques, Applications and Challengescited by 819
- 2018Evidential Deep Learning to Quantify Classification Uncertaintycited by 732
- 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 660
- 2015Weight Uncertainty in Neural Networkscited by 554
- 2020A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospectscited by 397
- 2020Hands-on Bayesian Neural Networks -- a Tutorial for Deep Learning Userscited by 338
- 2021What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like?cited by 308
18 more
- 2023Cross-Entropy Loss Functions: Theoretical Analysis and Applicationscited by 210
- 2018Understanding Measures of Uncertainty for Adversarial Example Detectioncited by 177
- 2019Evaluating model calibration in classificationcited by 168
- 2018Model Evaluation, Model Selection, and Algorithm Selection in Machine Learningcited by 157
- 2020Bayesian Neural Networks: An Introduction and Surveycited by 131
- 2021Bayesian Neural Network Priors Revisitedcited by 121
- 2024Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentation: Current Applications and Future Directionscited by 97
- 2021Classifier Calibration: A survey on how to assess and improve predicted class probabilitiescited by 73
- 2017Distance-based Confidence Score for Neural Network Classifierscited by 30
- 2020Machine learning enables completely automatic tuning of a quantum device faster than human expertscited by 23
- 2018Inhibited Softmax for Uncertainty Estimation in Neural Networkscited by 19
- 2021Colloquium: Advances in automation of quantum dot devices controlcited by 18
- 2022Tuning arrays with rays: Physics-informed tuning of quantum dot charge statescited by 16
- 2021Toward Robust Autotuning of Noisy Quantum Dot Devicescited by 13
- 2020Prior choice affects ability of Bayesian neural networks to identify unknownscited by 12
- 2021Cross-architecture Tuning of Silicon and SiGe-based Quantum Devices Using Machine Learningcited by 7
- 2021Estimation of Convex Polytopes for Automatic Discovery of Charge State Transitions in Quantum Dot Arrayscited by 3
- 2023A Cryogenic Memristive Neural Decoder for Fault-tolerant Quantum Error Correctioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.