Ranked Prioritization of Groups in Combinatorial Bandit Allocation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Preventing poaching through ranger patrols protects endangered wildlife, directly contributing to the UN Sustainable Development Goal 15 of life on land. Combinatorial bandits have been used to allocate limited patrol resources, but existing approaches overlook the fact that each location is home to multiple species in varying proportions, so a patrol benefits each species to differing degrees. When some species are more vulnerable, we ought to offer more protection to these animals; unfortunately, existing combinatorial bandit approaches do not offer a way to prioritize important species. To bridge this gap, (1) We propose a novel combinatorial bandit objective that trades off between reward maximization and also accounts for prioritization over species, which we call ranked prioritization. We show this objective can be expressed as a weighted linear sum of Lipschitz-continuous reward functions. (2) We provide RankedCUCB, an algorithm to select combinatorial actions that optimize our prioritization-based objective, and prove that it achieves asymptotic no-regret. (3) We demonstrate empirically that RankedCUCB leads to up to 38% improvement in outcomes for endangered species using real-world wildlife conservation data. Along with adapting to other challenges such as preventing illegal logging and overfishing, our no-regret algorithm addresses the general combinatorial bandit problem with a weighted linear objective.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2022.
Builds on
16 of 44 references.
References · 16
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
- 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 167
- 2020Algorithmic Fairnesscited by 143
- 2014Bandits with concave rewards and convex knapsackscited by 83
- 2014Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit and Its Extension to Probabilistically Triggered Armscited by 78
- 2019Combinatorial Sleeping Bandits with Fairness Constraintscited by 68
- 2021Fairness of Exposure in Stochastic Banditscited by 42
- 2020Fair Algorithms for Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Banditscited by 41
- 2020Dual-Mandate Patrols: Multi-Armed Bandits for Green Securitycited by 14
- 2019Censored Semi-Bandits: A Framework for Resource Allocation with Censored Feedbackcited by 13
- 2019Group Fairness in Bandit Arm Selectioncited by 12
- 2021Planning to Fairly Allocate: Probabilistic Fairness in the Restless Bandit Settingcited by 12
4 more
- 2021Robust Reinforcement Learning Under Minimax Regret for Green Securitycited by 12
- 2019Stay Ahead of Poachers: Illegal Wildlife Poaching Prediction and Patrol Planning Under Uncertainty with Field Test Evaluationscited by 11
- 2021Learning to be Fair: A Consequentialist Approach to Equitable Decision-Makingcited by 11
- 2013Dynamic Ad Allocation: Bandits with Budgetscited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2.
3 papers.
- 2024Towards Foundation-model-based Multiagent System to Accelerate AI for Social Impactcited by 9
- 2023Reflections from the Workshop on AI-Assisted Decision Making for Conservationcited by 2
- 2024Combining Diverse Information for Coordinated Action: Stochastic Bandit Algorithms for Heterogeneous Agentscited by 1
- 2024Towards Foundation-model-based Multiagent System to Accelerate AI for Social Impact10 Dec 2024
- 2024Combining Diverse Information for Coordinated Action: Stochastic Bandit Algorithms for Heterogeneous Agents6 Aug 2024
- 2023Reflections from the Workshop on AI-Assisted Decision Making for Conservation17 Jul 2023