Simultaneously Achieving Group Exposure Fairness and Within-Group Meritocracy in Stochastic Bandits
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Existing approaches to fairness in stochastic multi-armed bandits (MAB) primarily focus on exposure guarantee to individual arms. When arms are naturally grouped by certain attribute(s), we propose Bi-Level Fairness, which considers two levels of fairness. At the first level, Bi-Level Fairness guarantees a certain minimum exposure to each group. To address the unbalanced allocation of pulls to individual arms within a group, we consider meritocratic fairness at the second level, which ensures that each arm is pulled according to its merit within the group. Our work shows that we can adapt a UCB-based algorithm to achieve a Bi-Level Fairness by providing (i) anytime Group Exposure Fairness guarantees and (ii) ensuring individual-level Meritocratic Fairness within each group. We first show that one can decompose regret bounds into two components: (a) regret due to anytime group exposure fairness and (b) regret due to meritocratic fairness within each group. Our proposed algorithm BF-UCB balances these two regrets optimally to achieve the upper bound of O(√T) on regret; T being the stopping time. With the help of simulated experiments, we further show that BF-UCB achieves sub-linear regret; provides better group and individual exposure guarantees compared to existing algorithms; and does not result in a significant drop in reward with respect to UCB algorithm, which does not impose any fairness constraint.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Feb 2024.
Builds on
17 of 41 references.
References · 17
- 2016Fairness in Learning: Classic and Contextual Banditscited by 168
- 2019Achieving Fairness in the Stochastic Multi-armed Bandit Problemcited by 78
- 2019Combinatorial Sleeping Bandits with Fairness Constraintscited by 68
- 2018Online Learning with an Unknown Fairness Metriccited by 62
- 2017Calibrated Fairness in Banditscited by 43
- 2020Fair clustering via equitable group representationscited by 43
- 2021Fairness of Exposure in Stochastic Banditscited by 43
- 2019Fair Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits: Theory and Experimentscited by 42
- 2020Fair Algorithms for Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Banditscited by 41
- 2019Group Fairness in Bandit Arm Selectioncited by 13
- 2021Combinatorial Multi-armed Bandits for Resource Allocationcited by 10
- 2022Group Meritocratic Fairness in Linear Contextual Banditscited by 9
5 more
- 2020Ballooning Multi-Armed Banditscited by 7
- 2020Designing Truthful Contextual Multi-Armed Bandits based Sponsored Search Auctionscited by 7
- 2021Max-Min Grouped Banditscited by 7
- 2020Categorized Banditscited by 6
- 2023A Novel Demand Response Model and Method for Peak Reduction in Smart Grids -- PowerTACcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.