mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Neural Approximate Dynamic Programming for On-Demand Ride-Pooling

arXiv 1911.08842 ↗First posted 20 Nov 2019cs.CY cs.AI cs.SYcited by 33

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

On-demand ride-pooling (e.g., UberPool) has recently become popular because of its ability to lower costs for passengers while simultaneously increasing revenue for drivers and aggregation companies. Unlike in Taxi on Demand (ToD) services -- where a vehicle is only assigned one passenger at a time -- in on-demand ride-pooling, each (possibly partially filled) vehicle can be assigned a group of passenger requests with multiple different origin and destination pairs. To ensure near real-time response, existing solutions to the real-time ride-pooling problem are myopic in that they optimise the objective (e.g., maximise the number of passengers served) for the current time step without considering its effect on future assignments. This is because even a myopic assignment in ride-pooling involves considering what combinations of passenger requests that can be assigned to vehicles, which adds a layer of combinatorial complexity to the ToD problem. A popular approach that addresses the limitations of myopic assignments in ToD problems is Approximate Dynamic Programming (ADP). Existing ADP methods for ToD can only handle Linear Program (LP) based assignments, however, while the assignment problem in ride-pooling requires an Integer Linear Program (ILP) with bad LP relaxations. To this end, our key technical contribution is in providing a general ADP method that can learn from ILP-based assignments. Additionally, we handle the extra combinatorial complexity from combinations of passenger requests by using a Neural Network based approximate value function and show a connection to Deep Reinforcement Learning that allows us to learn this value-function with increased stability and sample-efficiency. We show that our approach outperforms past approaches on a real-world dataset by up to 16%, a significant improvement in city-scale transportation problems.

Key facts. Cited by 33 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Nov 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 6; 2022: 4; 2023: 5; 2024: 4; 2025: 12; 2026: 2.

33 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Reinforcement Learning for Ridesharing: An Extended Surveycited by 35
  2. 2021Real-world Ride-hailing Vehicle Repositioning using Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 22
  3. 2021Data-Driven Methods for Balancing Fairness and Efficiency in Ride-Poolingcited by 9
  4. 2022An Online Approach to Solve the Dynamic Vehicle Routing Problem with Stochastic Trip Requests for Paratransit Servicescited by 8
  5. 2025BMG-Q: Localized Bipartite Match Graph Attention Q-Learning for Ride-Pooling Order Dispatchcited by 7
  6. 2024Enabling MCTS Explainability for Sequential Planning Through Computation Tree Logiccited by 6
  7. 2023Using Simple Incentives to Improve Two-Sided Fairness in Ridesharing Systemscited by 5
  8. 2024Multi Agent Reinforcement Learning for Sequential Satellite Assignment Problemscited by 4
  9. 2025DECAF: Learning to be Fair in Multi-agent Resource Allocationcited by 4
  10. 2021Deep Reinforcement Learning for Demand Driven Services in Logistics and Transportation Systems: A Surveycited by 3
  11. 2023Future Aware Pricing and Matching for Sustainable On-demand Ride Poolingcited by 3
  12. 2023Mutual Information as Intrinsic Reward of Reinforcement Learning Agents for On-demand Ride Poolingcited by 3
21 more
  1. 2025Coordinating Ride-Pooling with Public Transit using Reward-Guided Conservative Q-Learning: An Offline Training and Online Fine-Tuning Reinforcement Learning Frameworkcited by 3
  2. 2021Conditional Expectation based Value Decomposition for Scalable On-Demand Ride Poolingcited by 1
  3. 2022Designing Decision Support Systems for Emergency Response: Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 1
  4. 2022ADPTriage: Approximate Dynamic Programming for Bug Triagecited by 1
  5. 2023Neural Approximate Dynamic Programming for the Ultra-fast Order Dispatching Problemcited by 1
  6. 2023Dynamic AGV Task Allocation in Intelligent Warehousescited by 1
  7. 2025Optimizing Ride-Pooling Operations with Extended Pickup and Drop-Off Flexibilitycited by 1
  8. 2025Past-Discounting is Key for Learning Markovian Fairness with Long Horizonscited by 1
  9. 2025Fair Algorithms with Probing for Multi-Agent Multi-Armed Banditscited by 1
  10. 2021Efficiency, Fairness, and Stability in Non-Commercial Peer-to-Peer Ridesharingcited by 0
  11. 2022Learning Individual Policies in Large Multi-agent Systems through Local Variance Minimizationcited by 0
  12. 2024A Survey on Applications of Reinforcement Learning in Spatial Resource Allocationcited by 0
  13. 2024Long-term Fairness in Ride-Hailing Platformcited by 0
  14. 2025Ride-pool Assignment Algorithms: Modern Implementation and Swapping Heuristicscited by 0
  15. 2025Joint Matching and Pricing for Crowd-shipping with In-store Customerscited by 0
  16. 2025Online Learning with Probing for Sequential User-Centric Selectioncited by 0
  17. 2025Adaptive Optimisation of Ride-Pooling Personalised Fares in a Stochastic Frameworkcited by 0
  18. 2025Non-myopic Matching and Rebalancing in Large-Scale On-Demand Ride-Pooling Systems Using Simulation-Informed Reinforcement Learningcited by 0
  19. 2025A General Incentives-Based Framework for Fairness in Multi-agent Resource Allocationcited by 0
  20. 2026Dynamic Vehicle Routing Problem with Prompt Confirmation of Advance Requestscited by 0
  21. 2026JointMatch: A Unified Heterogeneous Graph Neural Solver for Large-Scale Ride-Sharing Matchingcited by 0