mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A General Incentives-Based Framework for Fairness in Multi-agent Resource Allocation

arXiv 2510.26740 ↗First posted 30 Oct 2025cs.MA cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce the General Incentives-based Framework for Fairness (GIFF), a novel approach for fair multi-agent resource allocation that infers fair decision-making from standard value functions. In resource-constrained settings, agents optimizing for efficiency often create inequitable outcomes. Our approach leverages the action-value (Q-)function to balance efficiency and fairness without requiring additional training. Specifically, our method computes a local fairness gain for each action and introduces a counterfactual advantage correction term to discourage over-allocation to already well-off agents. This approach is formalized within a centralized control setting, where an arbitrator uses the GIFF-modified Q-values to solve an allocation problem. Empirical evaluations across diverse domains, including dynamic ridesharing, homelessness prevention, and a complex job allocation task-demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms strong baselines and can discover far-sighted, equitable policies. The framework's effectiveness is supported by a theoretical foundation; we prove its fairness surrogate is a principled lower bound on the true fairness improvement and that its trade-off parameter offers monotonic tuning. Our findings establish GIFF as a robust and principled framework for leveraging standard reinforcement learning components to achieve more equitable outcomes in complex multi-agent systems.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.

Builds on

9 of 27 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
  4. 2020Learning Fair Policies in Multiobjective (Deep) Reinforcement Learning with Average and Discounted Rewardscited by 60
  5. 2019Learning Fairness in Multi-Agent Systemscited by 44
  6. 2020Learning Fair Policies in Decentralized Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  7. 2019Neural Approximate Dynamic Programming for On-Demand Ride-Poolingcited by 33
  8. 2021Data-Driven Methods for Balancing Fairness and Efficiency in Ride-Poolingcited by 9
  9. 2023Using Simple Incentives to Improve Two-Sided Fairness in Ridesharing Systemscited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.