A General Incentives-Based Framework for Fairness in Multi-agent Resource Allocation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce the General Incentives-based Framework for Fairness (GIFF), a novel approach for fair multi-agent resource allocation that infers fair decision-making from standard value functions. In resource-constrained settings, agents optimizing for efficiency often create inequitable outcomes. Our approach leverages the action-value (Q-)function to balance efficiency and fairness without requiring additional training. Specifically, our method computes a local fairness gain for each action and introduces a counterfactual advantage correction term to discourage over-allocation to already well-off agents. This approach is formalized within a centralized control setting, where an arbitrator uses the GIFF-modified Q-values to solve an allocation problem. Empirical evaluations across diverse domains, including dynamic ridesharing, homelessness prevention, and a complex job allocation task-demonstrate that our framework consistently outperforms strong baselines and can discover far-sighted, equitable policies. The framework's effectiveness is supported by a theoretical foundation; we prove its fairness surrogate is a principled lower bound on the true fairness improvement and that its trade-off parameter offers monotonic tuning. Our findings establish GIFF as a robust and principled framework for leveraging standard reinforcement learning components to achieve more equitable outcomes in complex multi-agent systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Oct 2025.
Builds on
9 of 27 references.
References · 9
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2020Learning Fair Policies in Multiobjective (Deep) Reinforcement Learning with Average and Discounted Rewardscited by 60
- 2019Learning Fairness in Multi-Agent Systemscited by 44
- 2020Learning Fair Policies in Decentralized Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
- 2019Neural Approximate Dynamic Programming for On-Demand Ride-Poolingcited by 33
- 2021Data-Driven Methods for Balancing Fairness and Efficiency in Ride-Poolingcited by 9
- 2023Using Simple Incentives to Improve Two-Sided Fairness in Ridesharing Systemscited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.