mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Data-Driven Methods for Balancing Fairness and Efficiency in Ride-Pooling

arXiv 2110.03524 ↗First posted 7 Oct 2021cs.AIcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Rideshare and ride-pooling platforms use artificial intelligence-based matching algorithms to pair riders and drivers. However, these platforms can induce inequality either through an unequal income distribution or disparate treatment of riders. We investigate two methods to reduce forms of inequality in ride-pooling platforms: (1) incorporating fairness constraints into the objective function and (2) redistributing income to drivers to reduce income fluctuation and inequality. To evaluate our solutions, we use the New York City taxi data set. For the first method, we find that optimizing for driver-side fairness outperforms state-of-the-art models on the number of riders serviced, both in the worst-off neighborhood and overall, showing that optimizing for fairness can assist profitability in certain circumstances. For the second method, we explore income redistribution as a way to combat income inequality by having drivers keep an r fraction of their income, and contributing the rest to a redistribution pool. For certain values of r, most drivers earn near their Shapley value, while still incentivizing drivers to maximize value, thereby avoiding the free-rider problem and reducing income variability. The first method can be extended to many definitions of fairness and the second method provably improves fairness without affecting profitability.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Oct 2021.

Builds on

9 of 36 references.

References · 9

  1. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 629
  2. 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 281
  3. 2019Efficient Ridesharing Order Dispatching with Mean Field Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 57
  4. 2019Neural Approximate Dynamic Programming for On-Demand Ride-Poolingcited by 33
  5. 2019Balancing the Tradeoff between Profit and Fairness in Rideshare Platforms During High-Demand Hourscited by 17
  6. 2020Group-level Fairness Maximization in Online Bipartite Matchingcited by 14
  7. 2020Trading the System Efficiency for the Income Equality of Drivers in Ridesharecited by 7
  8. 2020Disparate Impact of Artificial Intelligence Bias in Ridehailing Economy's Price Discrimination Algorithmscited by 1
  9. 2020Fair Ride Allocation on a Linecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

9 papers.