From Insight to Exploit: Leveraging LLM Collaboration for Adaptive Adversarial Text Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
LLMs can provide substantial zero-shot performance on diverse tasks using a simple task prompt, eliminating the need for training or fine-tuning. However, when applying these models to sensitive tasks, it is crucial to thoroughly assess their robustness against adversarial inputs. In this work, we introduce Static Deceptor (StaDec) and Dynamic Deceptor (DyDec), two innovative attack frameworks designed to systematically generate dynamic and adaptive adversarial examples by leveraging the understanding of the LLMs. We produce subtle and natural-looking adversarial inputs that preserve semantic similarity to the original text while effectively deceiving the target LLM. By utilizing an automated, LLM-driven pipeline, we eliminate the dependence on external heuristics. Our attacks evolve with the advancements in LLMs and demonstrate strong transferability across models unknown to the attacker. Overall, this work provides a systematic approach for the self-assessment of an LLM's robustness. We release our code and data at https://github.com/Shukti042/AdversarialExample.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Nov 2025.
Builds on
26 of 49 references.
References · 26
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,486
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,979
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,480
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,880
- 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 817
- 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 731
- 2019Is BERT Really Robust? A Strong Baseline for Natural Language Attack on Text Classification and Entailmentcited by 668
- 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Modelscited by 647
- 2023Detecting Language Model Attacks with Perplexitycited by 429
- 2018Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examplescited by 424
- 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 406
- 2017"Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detectioncited by 361
14 more
- 2019What BERT is not: Lessons from a new suite of psycholinguistic diagnostics for language modelscited by 317
- 2020BAE: BERT-based Adversarial Examples for Text Classificationcited by 316
- 2018Adversarial Example Generation with Syntactically Controlled Paraphrase Networkscited by 285
- 2023Is ChatGPT better than Human Annotators? Potential and Limitations of ChatGPT in Explaining Implicit Hate Speechcited by 166
- 2019Do NLP Models Know Numbers? Probing Numeracy in Embeddingscited by 158
- 2025DataSentinel: A Game-Theoretic Detection of Prompt Injection Attackscited by 142
- 2024Is LLM-as-a-Judge Robust? Investigating Universal Adversarial Attacks on Zero-shot LLM Assessmentcited by 120
- 2023An LLM can Fool Itself: A Prompt-Based Adversarial Attackcited by 114
- 2022Evaluating the Susceptibility of Pre-Trained Language Models via Handcrafted Adversarial Examplescited by 69
- 2023Probing LLMs for hate speech detection: strengths and vulnerabilitiescited by 52
- 2020What's in a Name? Are BERT Named Entity Representations just as Good for any other Name?cited by 17
- 2020Compositional and Lexical Semantics in RoBERTa, BERT and DistilBERT: A Case Study on CoQAcited by 12
- 2023Guiding LLM to Fool Itself: Automatically Manipulating Machine Reading Comprehension Shortcut Triggerscited by 10
- 2019Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Sentence Embeddingscited by 9
Built on by
Not cited yet.