Syntax-guided Neural Module Distillation to Probe Compositionality in Sentence Embeddings
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Past work probing compositionality in sentence embedding models faces issues determining the causal impact of implicit syntax representations. Given a sentence, we construct a neural module net based on its syntax parse and train it end-to-end to approximate the sentence's embedding generated by a transformer model. The distillability of a transformer to a Syntactic NeurAl Module Net (SynNaMoN) then captures whether syntax is a strong causal model of its compositional ability. Furthermore, we address questions about the geometry of semantic composition by specifying individual SynNaMoN modules' internal architecture & linearity. We find differences in the distillability of various sentence embedding models that broadly correlate with their performance, but observe that distillability doesn't considerably vary by model size. We also present preliminary evidence that much syntax-guided composition in sentence embedding models is linear, and that non-linearities may serve primarily to handle non-compositional phrases.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jan 2023.
Builds on
27 of 35 references.
References · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 981
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
- 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 456
- 2017Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Datacited by 432
- 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 422
- 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 376
- 2019Visualizing and Measuring the Geometry of BERTcited by 216
- 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 151
15 more
- 2018Assessing Gender Bias in Machine Translation -- A Case Study with Google Translatecited by 121
- 2016Learning to Compose Neural Networks for Question Answeringcited by 85
- 2022Characterizing Intrinsic Compositionality in Transformers with Tree Projectionscited by 41
- 2021The Low-Dimensional Linear Geometry of Contextualized Word Representationscited by 40
- 2021What if This Modified That? Syntactic Interventions via Counterfactual Embeddingscited by 39
- 2019Discovering the Compositional Structure of Vector Representations with Role Learning Networkscited by 34
- 2019Correlating neural and symbolic representations of languagecited by 33
- 2021Do Syntactic Probes Probe Syntax? Experiments with Jabberwocky Probingcited by 28
- 2018RNNs Implicitly Implement Tensor Product Representationscited by 26
- 2020An information theoretic view on selecting linguistic probescited by 19
- 2021Causal Distillation for Language Modelscited by 19
- 2018Using Syntax to Ground Referring Expressions in Natural Imagescited by 16
- 2020A Matter of Framing: The Impact of Linguistic Formalism on Probing Resultscited by 12
- 2019Pitfalls in the Evaluation of Sentence Embeddingscited by 9
- 2019In Search for Linear Relations in Sentence Embedding Spacescited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.