Semantic Composition in Visually Grounded Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
What is sentence meaning and its ideal representation? Much of the expressive power of human language derives from semantic composition, the mind's ability to represent meaning hierarchically & relationally over constituents. At the same time, much sentential meaning is outside the text and requires grounding in sensory, motor, and experiential modalities to be adequately learned. Although large language models display considerable compositional ability, recent work shows that visually-grounded language models drastically fail to represent compositional structure. In this thesis, we explore whether & how models compose visually grounded semantics, and how we might improve their ability to do so. Specifically, we introduce 1) WinogroundVQA, a new compositional visual question answering benchmark, 2) Syntactic Neural Module Distillation, a measure of compositional ability in sentence embedding models, 3) Causal Tracing for Image Captioning Models to locate neural representations vital for vision-language composition, 4) Syntactic MeanPool to inject a compositional inductive bias into sentence embeddings, and 5) Cross-modal Attention Congruence Regularization, a self-supervised objective function for vision-language relation alignment. We close by discussing connections of our work to neuroscience, psycholinguistics, formal semantics, and philosophy.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 66 of its 109 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 May 2023.
Builds on
66 of 109 references.
References · 66
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
- 2022BLIP: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training for Unified Vision-Language Understanding and Generationcited by 4,322
- 2021Zero-Shot Text-to-Image Generationcited by 4,288
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
38 more
- 2019ViLBERT: Pretraining Task-Agnostic Visiolinguistic Representations for Vision-and-Language Taskscited by 2,222
- 2017SemEval-2017 Task 1: Semantic Textual Similarity - Multilingual and Cross-lingual Focused Evaluationcited by 1,001
- 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 981
- 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 775
- 2021FLAVA: A Foundational Language And Vision Alignment Modelcited by 649
- 2022Winoground: Probing Vision and Language Models for Visio-Linguistic Compositionalitycited by 529
- 2018What you can cram into a single vector: Probing sentence embeddings for linguistic propertiescited by 457
- 2021Large Dual Encoders Are Generalizable Retrieverscited by 456
- 2017Supervised Learning of Universal Sentence Representations from Natural Language Inference Datacited by 432
- 2021Causal Abstractions of Neural Networkscited by 422
- 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 376
- 2020Experience Grounds Languagecited by 242
- 2019Visualizing and Measuring the Geometry of BERTcited by 216
- 2020ERNIE-ViL: Knowledge Enhanced Vision-Language Representations Through Scene Graphcited by 211
- 2022CREPE: Can Vision-Language Foundation Models Reason Compositionally?cited by 181
- 2021Pretrained Transformers as Universal Computation Enginescited by 162
- 2020Probing the Probing Paradigm: Does Probing Accuracy Entail Task Relevance?cited by 151
- 2021Causal Attention for Vision-Language Taskscited by 111
- 2016Learning to Compose Neural Networks for Question Answeringcited by 85
- 2020Multimodal Pretraining Unmasked: A Meta-Analysis and a Unified Framework of Vision-and-Language BERTscited by 71
- 2021Probing Inter-modality: Visual Parsing with Self-Attention for Vision-Language Pre-trainingcited by 67
- 2019Linguistic generalization and compositionality in modern artificial neural networkscited by 58
- 2022VL-InterpreT: An Interactive Visualization Tool for Interpreting Vision-Language Transformerscited by 53
- 2021Syntax-BERT: Improving Pre-trained Transformers with Syntax Treescited by 51
- 2022Neurocompositional computing: From the Central Paradox of Cognition to a new generation of AI systemscited by 44
- 2022Why is Winoground Hard? Investigating Failures in Visuolinguistic Compositionalitycited by 44
- 2022A Benchmark for Compositional Visual Reasoningcited by 43
- 2022Characterizing Intrinsic Compositionality in Transformers with Tree Projectionscited by 41
- 2021The Low-Dimensional Linear Geometry of Contextualized Word Representationscited by 40
- 2021What if This Modified That? Syntactic Interventions via Counterfactual Embeddingscited by 39
- 2019Discovering the Compositional Structure of Vector Representations with Role Learning Networkscited by 34
- 2019Correlating neural and symbolic representations of languagecited by 33
- 2021ROSITA: Enhancing Vision-and-Language Semantic Alignments via Cross- and Intra-modal Knowledge Integrationcited by 31
- 2021Do Syntactic Probes Probe Syntax? Experiments with Jabberwocky Probingcited by 28
- 2018RNNs Implicitly Implement Tensor Product Representationscited by 26
- 2020Improving BERT with Syntax-aware Local Attentioncited by 26
- 2019Aligning Linguistic Words and Visual Semantic Units for Image Captioningcited by 25
- 2019From Balustrades to Pierre Vinken: Looking for Syntax in Transformer Self-Attentionscited by 22
50 most cited of 66 All 66 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.
1 paper.