When is Cognitive Radar Beneficial?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
When should an online reinforcement learning-based frequency agile cognitive radar be expected to outperform a rule-based adaptive waveform selection strategy? We seek insight regarding this question by examining a dynamic spectrum access scenario, in which the radar wishes to transmit in the widest unoccupied bandwidth during each pulse repetition interval. Online learning is compared to a fixed rule-based sense-and-avoid strategy. We show that given a simple Markov channel model, the problem can be examined analytically for simple cases via stochastic dominance. Additionally, we show that for more realistic channel assumptions, learning-based approaches demonstrate greater ability to generalize. However, for short time-horizon problems that are well-specified, we find that machine learning approaches may perform poorly due to the inherent limitation of convergence time. We draw conclusions as to when learning-based approaches are expected to be beneficial and provide guidelines for future study.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2022.
Builds on
5 of 20 references.
References · 5
- 2019Measuring the Reliability of Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 49
- 2019Stochastically Dominant Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
- 2021Constrained Contextual Bandit Learning for Adaptive Radar Waveform Selectioncited by 5
- 2021Online Meta-Learning for Scene-Diverse Waveform-Agile Radar Target Trackingcited by 4
- 2022Universal Learning Waveform Selection Strategies for Adaptive Target Trackingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.