mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

When is Cognitive Radar Beneficial?

arXiv 2212.00597 ↗First posted 1 Dec 2022cs.IT cs.LG eess.SPcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When should an online reinforcement learning-based frequency agile cognitive radar be expected to outperform a rule-based adaptive waveform selection strategy? We seek insight regarding this question by examining a dynamic spectrum access scenario, in which the radar wishes to transmit in the widest unoccupied bandwidth during each pulse repetition interval. Online learning is compared to a fixed rule-based sense-and-avoid strategy. We show that given a simple Markov channel model, the problem can be examined analytically for simple cases via stochastic dominance. Additionally, we show that for more realistic channel assumptions, learning-based approaches demonstrate greater ability to generalize. However, for short time-horizon problems that are well-specified, we find that machine learning approaches may perform poorly due to the inherent limitation of convergence time. We draw conclusions as to when learning-based approaches are expected to be beneficial and provide guidelines for future study.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Dec 2022.

Builds on

5 of 20 references.

References · 5

  1. 2019Measuring the Reliability of Reinforcement Learning Algorithmscited by 49
  2. 2019Stochastically Dominant Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 12
  3. 2021Constrained Contextual Bandit Learning for Adaptive Radar Waveform Selectioncited by 5
  4. 2021Online Meta-Learning for Scene-Diverse Waveform-Agile Radar Target Trackingcited by 4
  5. 2022Universal Learning Waveform Selection Strategies for Adaptive Target Trackingcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.