mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Assuring the Machine Learning Lifecycle: Desiderata, Methods, and Challenges

arXiv 1905.04223 ↗First posted 10 May 2019cs.LG cs.SE stat.MLcited by 39

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning has evolved into an enabling technology for a wide range of highly successful applications. The potential for this success to continue and accelerate has placed machine learning (ML) at the top of research, economic and political agendas. Such unprecedented interest is fuelled by a vision of ML applicability extending to healthcare, transportation, defence and other domains of great societal importance. Achieving this vision requires the use of ML in safety-critical applications that demand levels of assurance beyond those needed for current ML applications. Our paper provides a comprehensive survey of the state-of-the-art in the assurance of ML, i.e. in the generation of evidence that ML is sufficiently safe for its intended use. The survey covers the methods capable of providing such evidence at different stages of the machine learning lifecycle, i.e. of the complex, iterative process that starts with the collection of the data used to train an ML component for a system, and ends with the deployment of that component within the system. The paper begins with a systematic presentation of the ML lifecycle and its stages. We then define assurance desiderata for each stage, review existing methods that contribute to achieving these desiderata, and identify open challenges that require further research.

Key facts. Cited by 39 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 10 May 2019.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 7; 2022: 7; 2023: 12; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 6.

39 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 207
  2. 2021Guidance on the Assurance of Machine Learning in Autonomous Systems (AMLAS)cited by 42
  3. 2022A Validity Perspective on Evaluating the Justified Use of Data-driven Decision-making Algorithmscited by 30
  4. 2021The Role of Explainability in Assuring Safety of Machine Learning in Healthcarecited by 26
  5. 2023A Meta-Summary of Challenges in Building Products with ML Components -- Collecting Experiences from 4758+ Practitionerscited by 22
  6. 2021Reliability Assessment and Safety Arguments for Machine Learning Components in System Assurancecited by 16
  7. 2022Ergo, SMIRK is Safe: A Safety Case for a Machine Learning Component in a Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Brake Systemcited by 14
  8. 2024Don't Push the Button! Exploring Data Leakage Risks in Machine Learning and Transfer Learningcited by 12
  9. 2021DeepCert: Verification of Contextually Relevant Robustness for Neural Network Image Classifierscited by 11
  10. 2023Machine Learning with Requirements: a Manifestocited by 8
  11. 2025Atlas: A Framework for ML Lifecycle Provenance & Transparencycited by 8
  12. 2021The missing link: Developing a safety case for perception components in automated drivingcited by 7
27 more
  1. 2021Certification of embedded systems based on Machine Learning: A surveycited by 6
  2. 2023Model Reporting for Certifiable AI: A Proposal from Merging EU Regulation into AI Developmentcited by 6
  3. 2022Discrete-Event Controller Synthesis for Autonomous Systems with Deep-Learning Perception Componentscited by 5
  4. 2023Is a Seat at the Table Enough? Engaging Teachers and Students in Dataset Specification for ML in Educationcited by 5
  5. 2024Artificial Intelligence in Industry 4.0: A Review of Integration Challenges for Industrial Systemscited by 5
  6. 2022When Bioprocess Engineering Meets Machine Learning: A Survey from the Perspective of Automated Bioprocess Developmentcited by 4
  7. 2023Optimization's Neglected Normative Commitmentscited by 4
  8. 2023Iterative Assessment and Improvement of DNN Operational Accuracycited by 3
  9. 2022A causal model of safety assurance for machine learningcited by 2
  10. 2022Data Justice in Practice: A Guide for Developerscited by 2
  11. 2023MLTEing Models: Negotiating, Evaluating, and Documenting Model and System Qualitiescited by 2
  12. 2023Machine Learning practices and infrastructurescited by 2
  13. 2025Talking About the Assumption in the Roomcited by 2
  14. 2025Justified Evidence Collection for Argument-based AI Fairness Assurancecited by 2
  15. 2022Integrating Testing and Operation-related Quantitative Evidences in Assurance Cases to Argue Safety of Data-Driven AI/ML Componentscited by 1
  16. 2023Trustworthy, responsible, ethical AI in manufacturing and supply chains: synthesis and emerging research questionscited by 1
  17. 2026Governed Capability Evolution: Lifecycle-Time Compatibility Checking and Rollback for AI-Component-Based Systems, with a Proof-of-Concept Evaluation on Embodied Agentscited by 1
  18. 2026To Build or Not to Build? Factors that Lead to Non-Development or Abandonment of AI Systemscited by 1
  19. 2026A Standardized Framework for Machine Learning in Power System Protectioncited by 1
  20. 2023Fiduciary Responsibility: Facilitating Public Trust in Automated Decision Makingcited by 0
  21. 2023Optimizing the AI Development Process by Providing the Best Support Environmentcited by 0
  22. 2023Towards Establishing Systematic Classification Requirements for Automated Drivingcited by 0
  23. 2024Landscape of AI safety concerns -- A methodology to support safety assurance for AI-based autonomous systemscited by 0
  24. 2025Engineering Artificial Intelligence: Framework, Challenges, and Future Directioncited by 0
  25. 2026The Machine Learning Canvas: Empirical Findings on Why Strategy Matters More Than AI Code Generationcited by 0
  26. 2026I'm Sorry Driver, I'm Afraid I Can't Do That: Appraising the Safety of LLMs within Automotive Contextscited by 0
  27. 2026From Failure to Alignment: A Requirements Engineering Framework for Machine Learning Systemscited by 0