mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DeepCert: Verification of Contextually Relevant Robustness for Neural Network Image Classifiers

arXiv 2103.01629 ↗First posted 2 Mar 2021cs.LGcited by 11

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce DeepCert, a tool-supported method for verifying the robustness of deep neural network (DNN) image classifiers to contextually relevant perturbations such as blur, haze, and changes in image contrast. While the robustness of DNN classifiers has been the subject of intense research in recent years, the solutions delivered by this research focus on verifying DNN robustness to small perturbations in the images being classified, with perturbation magnitude measured using established Lp norms. This is useful for identifying potential adversarial attacks on DNN image classifiers, but cannot verify DNN robustness to contextually relevant image perturbations, which are typically not small when expressed with Lp norms. DeepCert addresses this underexplored verification problem by supporting:(1) the encoding of real-world image perturbations; (2) the systematic evaluation of contextually relevant DNN robustness, using both testing and formal verification; (3) the generation of contextually relevant counterexamples; and, through these, (4) the selection of DNN image classifiers suitable for the operational context (i)envisaged when a potentially safety-critical system is designed, or (ii)observed by a deployed system. We demonstrate the effectiveness of DeepCert by showing how it can be used to verify the robustness of DNN image classifiers build for two benchmark datasets (`German Traffic Sign' and `CIFAR-10') to multiple contextually relevant perturbations.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Mar 2021.

Builds on

18 of 32 references.

References · 18

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
  4. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  5. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  6. 2015The Limitations of Deep Learning in Adversarial Settingscited by 784
  7. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
  8. 2017Adversarial Examples: Attacks and Defenses for Deep Learningcited by 350
  9. 2016Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 262
  10. 2017DeepTest: Automated Testing of Deep-Neural-Network-driven Autonomous Carscited by 249
  11. 2018Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervalscited by 185
  12. 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
6 more
  1. 2018Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networkscited by 165
  2. 2019Assuring the Machine Learning Lifecycle: Desiderata, Methods, and Challengescited by 39
  3. 2020Parallelization Techniques for Verifying Neural Networkscited by 36
  4. 2019Deep Learning for Large-Scale Traffic-Sign Detection and Recognitioncited by 34
  5. 2017Deep Neural Networks as 0-1 Mixed Integer Linear Programs: A Feasibility Studycited by 25
  6. 2019Towards Analyzing Semantic Robustness of Deep Neural Networkscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 5; 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

11 papers.