Don't Push the Button! Exploring Data Leakage Risks in Machine Learning and Transfer Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Machine Learning (ML) has revolutionized various domains, offering predictive capabilities in several areas. However, with the increasing accessibility of ML tools, many practitioners, lacking deep ML expertise, adopt a "push the button" approach, utilizing user-friendly interfaces without a thorough understanding of underlying algorithms. While this approach provides convenience, it raises concerns about the reliability of outcomes, leading to challenges such as incorrect performance evaluation. This paper addresses a critical issue in ML, known as data leakage, where unintended information contaminates the training data, impacting model performance evaluation. Users, due to a lack of understanding, may inadvertently overlook crucial steps, leading to optimistic performance estimates that may not hold in real-world scenarios. The discrepancy between evaluated and actual performance on new data is a significant concern. In particular, this paper categorizes data leakage in ML, discussing how certain conditions can propagate through the ML workflow. Furthermore, it explores the connection between data leakage and the specific task being addressed, investigates its occurrence in Transfer Learning, and compares standard inductive ML with transductive ML frameworks. The conclusion summarizes key findings, emphasizing the importance of addressing data leakage for robust and reliable ML applications.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jan 2024.
Builds on
9 of 48 references.
References · 9
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2015Return of Frustratingly Easy Domain Adaptationcited by 389
- 2019Unmasking Clever Hans Predictors and Assessing What Machines Really Learncited by 359
- 2020Common pitfalls and recommendations for using machine learning to detect and prognosticate for COVID-19 using chest radiographs and CT scanscited by 158
- 2019Assuring the Machine Learning Lifecycle: Desiderata, Methods, and Challengescited by 39
- 2022Toward cross-subject and cross-session generalization in EEG-based emotion recognition: Systematic review, taxonomy, and methodscited by 17
- 2022On The Effects Of Data Normalisation For Domain Adaptation On EEG Datacited by 13
- 2022Management of Machine Learning Lifecycle Artifacts: A Surveycited by 13
- 2022Data Leakage in Notebooks: Static Detection and Better Processescited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 7.
11 papers.
- 2024L-CiteEval: Do Long-Context Models Truly Leverage Context for Responding?cited by 5
- 2026On the Evaluation Protocol of Gesture Recognition for UAV-based Rescue Operation based on Deep Learning: A Subject-Independence Perspectivecited by 1
- 2024Improving Image Data Leakage Detection in Automotive Softwarecited by 0
- 2025IMPACTX: improving model performance by appropriately constraining the training with teacher explanationscited by 0
- 2025ML2B: Benchmarking LLMs on Cross-Lingual ML Pipeline Generationcited by 0
- 2026Don't stop me now: How Validation Criteria Affect Checkpoint Selection and Early Stoppingcited by 0
- 2026Which Leakage Types Matter? A Quantitative Landscape Across 2,047 Benchmark Datasetscited by 0
- 2026Instance-Adaptive Parametrization for Amortized Variational Inferencecited by 0
- 2026Can Large Language Models Detect Methodological Flaws? Evidence from Gesture Recognition for UAV-Based Rescue Operation Based on Deep Learningcited by 0
- 2026Leak-Free Cross-Validated Stacking with Per-Architecture Calibration for Sand-Boil Segmentation in Earthen Leveescited by 0
- 2026It's All in the Way You Say It: The Role of Information Representation in LLM-Based Glycemic-Event Predictioncited by 0
- 2026It's All in the Way You Say It: The Role of Information Representation in LLM-Based Glycemic-Event Prediction8 Sep 2026
- 2026Leak-Free Cross-Validated Stacking with Per-Architecture Calibration for Sand-Boil Segmentation in Earthen Levees28 Jul 2026
- 2026Instance-Adaptive Parametrization for Amortized Variational Inference8 Apr 2026
- 2026Which Leakage Types Matter? A Quantitative Landscape Across 2,047 Benchmark Datasets5 Apr 2026
- 2026Can Large Language Models Detect Methodological Flaws? Evidence from Gesture Recognition for UAV-Based Rescue Operation Based on Deep Learning23 Mar 2026
- 2026Don't stop me now: How Validation Criteria Affect Checkpoint Selection and Early Stopping25 Feb 2026
- 2026On the Evaluation Protocol of Gesture Recognition for UAV-based Rescue Operation based on Deep Learning: A Subject-Independence Perspective19 Feb 2026
- 2025ML2B: Benchmarking LLMs on Cross-Lingual ML Pipeline Generation26 Sep 2025
- 2025IMPACTX: improving model performance by appropriately constraining the training with teacher explanations17 Feb 2025
- 2024Improving Image Data Leakage Detection in Automotive Software29 Oct 2024
- 2024L-CiteEval: Do Long-Context Models Truly Leverage Context for Responding?3 Oct 2024