mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Salutary Labeling with Zero Human Annotation

arXiv 2405.17627 ↗First posted 27 May 2024cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Active learning strategically selects informative unlabeled data points and queries their ground truth labels for model training. The prevailing assumption underlying this machine learning paradigm is that acquiring these ground truth labels will optimally enhance model performance. However, this assumption may not always hold true or maximize learning capacity, particularly considering the costly labor annotations required for ground truth labels. In contrast to traditional ground truth labeling, this paper proposes salutary labeling, which automatically assigns the most beneficial labels to the most informative samples without human annotation. Specifically, we utilize the influence function, a tool for estimating sample influence, to select newly added samples and assign their salutary labels by choosing the category that maximizes their positive influence. This process eliminates the need for human annotation. Extensive experiments conducted on nine benchmark datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our salutary labeling approach over traditional active learning strategies. Additionally, we provide several in-depth explorations and practical applications of large language model (LLM) fine-tuning.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 98 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 May 2024.

Builds on

46 of 98 references.

References · 46

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  4. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  5. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  6. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
  7. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  8. 2020FixMatch: Simplifying Semi-Supervised Learning with Consistency and Confidencecited by 2,085
  9. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,741
  10. 2016Temporal Ensembling for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 1,057
  11. 2017Virtual Adversarial Training: A Regularization Method for Supervised and Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 920
  12. 2019Deep Batch Active Learning by Diverse, Uncertain Gradient Lower Boundscited by 610
34 more
  1. 2020Learning from Noisy Labels with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 582
  2. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 580
  3. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
  4. 2020A Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 554
  5. 2021FlexMatch: Boosting Semi-Supervised Learning with Curriculum Pseudo Labelingcited by 540
  6. 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 533
  7. 2019BatchBALD: Efficient and Diverse Batch Acquisition for Deep Bayesian Active Learningcited by 432
  8. 2019Selection via Proxy: Efficient Data Selection for Deep Learningcited by 339
  9. 2019Learning Loss for Active Learningcited by 336
  10. 2020Influence Functions in Deep Learning Are Fragilecited by 252
  11. 2019Understanding and Utilizing Deep Neural Networks Trained with Noisy Labelscited by 209
  12. 2017Cost-Effective Active Learning for Deep Image Classificationcited by 166
  13. 2019On the Accuracy of Influence Functions for Measuring Group Effectscited by 147
  14. 2020Explaining Black Box Predictions and Unveiling Data Artifacts through Influence Functionscited by 144
  15. 2022If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?cited by 144
  16. 2022A Comparative Survey of Deep Active Learningcited by 89
  17. 2021Influence Selection for Active Learningcited by 84
  18. 2016Coresets for Scalable Bayesian Logistic Regressioncited by 79
  19. 2018On Coresets for Logistic Regressioncited by 67
  20. 2020Influence Function based Data Poisoning Attacks to Top-N Recommender Systemscited by 63
  21. 2018A Swiss Army Infinitesimal Jackknifecited by 54
  22. 2022Entropy-based Active Learning for Object Detection with Progressive Diversity Constraintcited by 53
  23. 2022A Survey of Active Learning for Natural Language Processingcited by 40
  24. 2021HYDRA: Hypergradient Data Relevance Analysis for Interpreting Deep Neural Networkscited by 38
  25. 2022Achieving Fairness at No Utility Cost via Data Reweighing with Influencecited by 38
  26. 2018Fighting Fire with Fire: Using Antidote Data to Improve Polarization and Fairness of Recommender Systemscited by 37
  27. 2023A comprehensive survey on deep active learning in medical image analysiscited by 35
  28. 2019Exploring Representativeness and Informativeness for Active Learningcited by 21
  29. 2023Revisiting the Fragility of Influence Functionscited by 20
  30. 2018Cost-Effective Training of Deep CNNs with Active Model Adaptationcited by 16
  31. 2022Characterizing the Influence of Graph Elementscited by 16
  32. 2014An ensemble-based system for automatic screening of diabetic retinopathycited by 14
  33. 2022Deep Active Learning with Noise Stabilitycited by 14
  34. 2023Active Learning on Medical Imagecited by 10

Built on by

Not cited yet.