mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning from What You Retrieve: Online RL Fine-Tuning for Semantic Retrieval

arXiv 2608.30753 ↗First posted 31 Aug 2026cs.IR cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In large-scale e-commerce retrieval, dual-encoder retrievers are op- timized for contrastive similarity, whereas downstream rerankers capture finer-grained relevance preferences; this objective mis- match limits end-to-end retrieval quality. Reinforcement Learning offers a way to use reward-model feedback for retriever adaptation, but we observe that standard policy-gradient updates can degrade embedding geometry, especially when the document index must remain frozen due to industrial constraints. To address this, we propose PAO (Positive-Advantage-Only), a selective RL optimization method. Our analysis reveals that in- discriminate penalization of negative samples (pushing away) in a frozen high-dimensional space disrupts pre-trained semantic man- ifolds. PAO selectively applies gradient updates only to retrieved items with positive advantages, effectively pulling query embed- dings toward high-reward regions while preserving global topo- logical stability. Experiments on both a massive industrial dataset and public benchmarks demonstrate that PAO significantly outper- forms standard RL and distillation baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Aug 2026.

Builds on

17 of 33 references.

References · 17

  1. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  2. 2018Representation Learning with Contrastive Predictive Codingcited by 7,777
  3. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  4. 2020Exploring Simple Siamese Representation Learningcited by 2,866
  5. 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
  6. 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,605
  7. 2020Approximate Nearest Neighbor Negative Contrastive Learning for Dense Text Retrievalcited by 849
  8. 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 723
  9. 2020RocketQA: An Optimized Training Approach to Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 413
  10. 2020Pretrained Transformers for Text Ranking: BERT and Beyondcited by 267
  11. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 190
  12. 2018Top-K Off-Policy Correction for a REINFORCE Recommender Systemcited by 182
5 more
  1. 2021RocketQAv2: A Joint Training Method for Dense Passage Retrieval and Passage Re-rankingcited by 176
  2. 2025Rank-R1: Enhancing Reasoning in LLM-based Document Rerankers via Reinforcement Learningcited by 60
  3. 2022Curriculum Learning for Dense Retrieval Distillationcited by 38
  4. 2018Differentiable Unbiased Online Learning to Rankcited by 24
  5. 2025GReF: A Unified Generative Framework for Efficient Reranking via Ordered Multi-token Predictioncited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Semantic Retrieval for Product Search in E-Commerce
  2. 2026SSR-GRPO: Integrating Supervision and Semantic IDs into Reinforcement Learning for Dense Retrieval in E-commerce
  3. 2025Retrieval-GRPO: A Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning Framework for Dense Retrieval in Taobao Search
  4. 2026RL-Index: Reinforcement Learning for Retrieval Index Reasoning
  5. 2026Efficient Generative Retrieval for E-commerce Search with Semantic Cluster IDs and Expert-Guided RL
  6. 2026Learning to Retrieve via Reinforcement Learning in Embedding Space
  7. 2025Annotation-Free Reinforcement Learning Query Rewriting via Verifiable Search Reward
  8. 2025Think Before You Retrieve: Learning Test-Time Adaptive Search with Small Language Models