mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Low-variance estimation in the Plackett-Luce model via quasi-Monte Carlo sampling

arXiv 2205.06024 ↗First posted 12 May 2022stat.ML cs.IR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Plackett-Luce (PL) model is ubiquitous in learning-to-rank (LTR) because it provides a useful and intuitive probabilistic model for sampling ranked lists. Counterfactual offline evaluation and optimization of ranking metrics are pivotal for using LTR methods in production. When adopting the PL model as a ranking policy, both tasks require the computation of expectations with respect to the model. These are usually approximated via Monte-Carlo (MC) sampling, since the combinatorial scaling in the number of items to be ranked makes their analytical computation intractable. Despite recent advances in improving the computational efficiency of the sampling process via the Gumbel top-k trick, the MC estimates can suffer from high variance. We develop a novel approach to producing more sample-efficient estimators of expectations in the PL model by combining the Gumbel top-k trick with quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) sampling, a well-established technique for variance reduction. We illustrate our findings both theoretically and empirically using real-world recommendation data from Amazon Music and the Yahoo learning-to-rank challenge.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2022.

Builds on

17 of 44 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2013Black Box Variational Inferencecited by 319
  3. 2019Monte Carlo Gradient Estimation in Machine Learningcited by 283
  4. 2019Stochastic Beams and Where to Find Them: The Gumbel-Top-k Trick for Sampling Sequences Without Replacementcited by 211
  5. 2016Unbiased Learning-to-Rank with Biased Feedbackcited by 157
  6. 2017Constrained Bayesian Optimization with Noisy Experimentscited by 104
  7. 2019Policy Learning for Fairness in Rankingcited by 74
  8. 2018Unbiased Learning to Rank with Unbiased Propensity Estimationcited by 61
  9. 2020Evaluating Stochastic Rankings with Expected Exposurecited by 53
  10. 2021Computationally Efficient Optimization of Plackett-Luce Ranking Models for Relevance and Fairnesscited by 36
  11. 2018Offline Evaluation of Ranking Policies with Click Modelscited by 32
  12. 2018Estimating Position Bias without Intrusive Interventionscited by 32
5 more
  1. 2018Quasi-Monte Carlo Variational Inferencecited by 24
  2. 2018Differentiable Unbiased Online Learning to Rankcited by 24
  3. 2019Policy-Gradient Training of Fair and Unbiased Ranking Functionscited by 16
  4. 2020Unifying Online and Counterfactual Learning to Rankcited by 15
  5. 2021Ranker-agnostic Contextual Position Bias Estimationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1.

1 paper.