mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Model Debiasing via Gradient-based Explanation on Representation

arXiv 2305.12178 ↗First posted 20 May 2023cs.LG cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning systems produce biased results towards certain demographic groups, known as the fairness problem. Recent approaches to tackle this problem learn a latent code (i.e., representation) through disentangled representation learning and then discard the latent code dimensions correlated with sensitive attributes (e.g., gender). Nevertheless, these approaches may suffer from incomplete disentanglement and overlook proxy attributes (proxies for sensitive attributes) when processing real-world data, especially for unstructured data, causing performance degradation in fairness and loss of useful information for downstream tasks. In this paper, we propose a novel fairness framework that performs debiasing with regard to both sensitive attributes and proxy attributes, which boosts the prediction performance of downstream task models without complete disentanglement. The main idea is to, first, leverage gradient-based explanation to find two model focuses, 1) one focus for predicting sensitive attributes and 2) the other focus for predicting downstream task labels, and second, use them to perturb the latent code that guides the training of downstream task models towards fairness and utility goals. We show empirically that our framework works with both disentangled and non-disentangled representation learning methods and achieves better fairness-accuracy trade-off on unstructured and structured datasets than previous state-of-the-art approaches.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2023.

Builds on

19 of 37 references.

References · 19

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  2. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  3. 2015Domain-Adversarial Training of Neural Networkscited by 3,044
  4. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,371
  5. 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
  6. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,109
  7. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
  8. 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
  9. 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 616
  10. 2018Learning Not to Learn: Training Deep Neural Networks with Biased Datacited by 255
  11. 2019Flexibly Fair Representation Learning by Disentanglementcited by 196
  12. 2019Full-Gradient Representation for Neural Network Visualizationcited by 191
7 more
  1. 2019On the Fairness of Disentangled Representationscited by 144
  2. 2018iFair: Learning Individually Fair Data Representations for Algorithmic Decision Makingcited by 64
  3. 2019Operationalizing Individual Fairness with Pairwise Fair Representationscited by 64
  4. 2021Understanding and Improving Fairness-Accuracy Trade-offs in Multi-Task Learningcited by 34
  5. 2018Creating Fair Models of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Riskcited by 23
  6. 2021OmniFair: A Declarative System for Model-Agnostic Group Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 18
  7. 2020Towards Model-Agnostic Post-Hoc Adjustment for Balancing Ranking Fairness and Algorithm Utilitycited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

2 papers.