mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quantifying Availability and Discovery in Recommender Systems via Stochastic Reachability

arXiv 2107.00833 ↗First posted 30 Jun 2021cs.IR cs.LG stat.MLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this work, we consider how preference models in interactive recommendation systems determine the availability of content and users' opportunities for discovery. We propose an evaluation procedure based on stochastic reachability to quantify the maximum probability of recommending a target piece of content to an user for a set of allowable strategic modifications. This framework allows us to compute an upper bound on the likelihood of recommendation with minimal assumptions about user behavior. Stochastic reachability can be used to detect biases in the availability of content and diagnose limitations in the opportunities for discovery granted to users. We show that this metric can be computed efficiently as a convex program for a variety of practical settings, and further argue that reachability is not inherently at odds with accuracy. We demonstrate evaluations of recommendation algorithms trained on large datasets of explicit and implicit ratings. Our results illustrate how preference models, selection rules, and user interventions impact reachability and how these effects can be distributed unevenly.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jun 2021.

Builds on

20 of 47 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018Actionable Recourse in Linear Classificationcited by 327
  2. 2016Recommendations as Treatments: Debiasing Learning and Evaluationcited by 246
  3. 2020Bias and Debias in Recommender System: A Survey and Future Directionscited by 239
  4. 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
  5. 2018Top-K Off-Policy Correction for a REINFORCE Recommender Systemcited by 181
  6. 2020A survey of algorithmic recourse: definitions, formulations, solutions, and prospectscited by 118
  7. 2017How Algorithmic Confounding in Recommendation Systems Increases Homogeneity and Decreases Utilitycited by 116
  8. 2019Embarrassingly Shallow Autoencoders for Sparse Datacited by 93
  9. 2017Boltzmann Exploration Done Rightcited by 69
  10. 2019A Troubling Analysis of Reproducibility and Progress in Recommender Systems Researchcited by 65
  11. 2019Auditing Radicalization Pathways on YouTubecited by 52
  12. 2019On the Difficulty of Evaluating Baselines: A Study on Recommender Systemscited by 46
8 more
  1. 2018Exploring Author Gender in Book Rating and Recommendationcited by 29
  2. 2020Do Offline Metrics Predict Online Performance in Recommender Systems?cited by 25
  3. 2019Recommendations and User Agency: The Reachability of Collaboratively-Filtered Informationcited by 21
  4. 2021Measuring Recommender System Effects with Simulated Userscited by 20
  5. 2020Exploring Artist Gender Bias in Music Recommendationcited by 12
  6. 2021How the Design of YouTube Influences User Sense of Agencycited by 12
  7. 2019The Impact of Popularity Bias on Fairness and Calibration in Recommendationcited by 9
  8. 2020A Longitudinal Analysis of YouTube's Promotion of Conspiracy Videoscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 3; 2023: 0; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

8 papers.