When Does a Laugh Begin? Structured Annotator Disagreement in Temporal Laughter Localization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Annotators routinely disagree on laughter boundaries and subtle chuckles, yet temporal laughter localization typically evaluates against a single reference annotation. We show that this disagreement is structured rather than random noise. Re-annotating the SMILE-Temporal benchmark (672 videos, 1,683 events) with 3-5 annotators per video (alpha = 0.757), we find systematic patterns: disagreement is 1.73 times larger at offsets than onsets, far more common for chuckles than full laughs (77% vs. 20%), and predictable from event attributes (AUC = 0.831). Evaluating against a single annotator breaks down under this structure: system scores shift by 0.246 F1 depending on the chosen ground truth, correctly ranking systems only 69.7% of the time (vs. 80% against all annotators). We propose a disagreement-calibrated evaluation that scores predictions against the full annotator distribution using conformally calibrated tolerance bands (wider at offsets, 0.727s, than onsets, 0.5s). The per-annotator annotations and analysis code are available at https://github.com/WSCSports/MTLLFM-temporal-laughter-localization.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2026.
Builds on
17 of 31 references.
References · 17
- 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 235
- 2022ABAW: Valence-Arousal Estimation, Expression Recognition, Action Unit Detection & Multi-Task Learning Challengescited by 156
- 2022The 'Problem' of Human Label Variation: On Ground Truth in Data, Modeling and Evaluationcited by 139
- 2014Label Distribution Learningcited by 124
- 2018Diagnosing Error in Temporal Action Detectorscited by 71
- 2021Generic Event Boundary Detection: A Benchmark for Event Segmentationcited by 65
- 2019SEWA DB: A Rich Database for Audio-Visual Emotion and Sentiment Research in the Wildcited by 62
- 2023SemEval-2023 Task 11: Learning With Disagreements (LeWiDi)cited by 52
- 2023Dense-Localizing Audio-Visual Events in Untrimmed Videos: A Large-Scale Benchmark and Baselinecited by 46
- 2023SMILE: Multimodal Dataset for Understanding Laughter in Video with Language Modelscited by 28
- 2017Trespassing the Boundaries: Labeling Temporal Bounds for Object Interactions in Egocentric Videocited by 14
- 2022Dilated Context Integrated Network with Cross-Modal Consensus for Temporal Emotion Localization in Videoscited by 10
5 more
- 2016Much Ado About Time: Exhaustive Annotation of Temporal Datacited by 6
- 2022Impact of annotation modality on label quality and model performance in the automatic assessment of laughter in-the-wildcited by 4
- 2024LEAD Dataset: How Can Labels for Sound Event Detection Vary Depending on Annotators?cited by 2
- 2026MTLLFM: Multimodal-Temporal Laughter Localization: UR-FUNNY-Temporal and SMILE-Temporal Benchmarks with an Adaptive Multimodal Fusion Modelcited by 2
- 2026SMILE-Next: Teaching Large Language Models to Detect, Classify, and Reason about Laughtercited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.