mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Monte Carlo with Determinantal Point Processes

arXiv 1605.00361 ↗First posted 2 May 2016math.PR math.CA stat.COcited by 22

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We show that repulsive random variables can yield Monte Carlo methods with faster convergence rates than the typical N-1/2, where N is the number of integrand evaluations. More precisely, we propose stochastic numerical quadratures involving determinantal point processes associated with multivariate orthogonal polynomials, and we obtain root mean square errors that decrease as N-(1+1/d)/2, where d is the dimension of the ambient space. First, we prove a central limit theorem (CLT) for the linear statistics of a class of determinantal point processes, when the reference measure is a product measure supported on a hypercube, which satisfies the Nevai-class regularity condition, a result which may be of independent interest. Next, we introduce a Monte Carlo method based on these determinantal point processes, and prove a CLT with explicit limiting variance for the quadrature error, when the reference measure satisfies a stronger regularity condition. As a corollary, by taking a specific reference measure and using a construction similar to importance sampling, we obtain a general Monte Carlo method, which applies to any measure with continuously derivable density. Loosely speaking, our method can be interpreted as a stochastic counterpart to Gaussian quadrature, which, at the price of some convergence rate, is easily generalizable to any dimension and has a more explicit error term.

Key facts. Cited by 22 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 2 May 2016.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 6; 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

22 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2021Kernel Thinningcited by 47
  2. 2022Maximum Likelihood Estimation in Gaussian Process Regression is Ill-Posedcited by 16
  3. 2023Improved Financial Forecasting via Quantum Machine Learningcited by 14
  4. 2021Determinantal point processes based on orthogonal polynomials for sampling minibatches in SGDcited by 12
  5. 2023Kernel quadrature with randomly pivoted Choleskycited by 11
  6. 2022A Faster Sampler for Discrete Determinantal Point Processescited by 6
  7. 2023When can Regression-Adjusted Control Variates Help? Rare Events, Sobolev Embedding and Minimax Optimalitycited by 4
  8. 2024Small coresets via negative dependence: DPPs, linear statistics, and concentrationcited by 4
  9. 2022Uphill Roads to Variational Tightness: Monotonicity and Monte Carlo Objectivescited by 3
  10. 2023Signal reconstruction using determinantal samplingcited by 2
  11. 2025Stationary MMD Pointscited by 2
  12. 2023On sampling determinantal and Pfaffian point processes on a quantum computercited by 1
10 more
  1. 2023Policy Gradient with Kernel Quadraturecited by 1
  2. 2025Are LLMs Enough for Hyperpartisan, Fake, Polarized and Harmful Content Detection? Evaluating In-Context Learning vs. Fine-Tuningcited by 1
  3. 2025Repulsive Monte Carlo on the sphere for the sliced Wasserstein distancecited by 1
  4. 2022A novel sampler for Gauss-Hermite determinantal point processes with application to Monte Carlo integrationcited by 0
  5. 2024Duality induced by an embedding structure of determinantal point processcited by 0
  6. 2024Naturally Private Recommendations with Determinantal Point Processescited by 0
  7. 2025Quenched large deviations for Monte Carlo integration with Coulomb gasescited by 0
  8. 2026On two ways to use determinantal point processes for Monte Carlo integrationcited by 0
  9. 2026Fast determinantal sampling on general spaces and diffusion geometrycited by 0
  10. 2026Beyond Worst-Case Coreset Bounds for k-Clustering via Determinantal Samplingcited by 0