On sampling determinantal and Pfaffian point processes on a quantum computer
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
DPPs were introduced by Macchi as a model in quantum optics the 1970s. Since then, they have been widely used as models and subsampling tools in statistics and computer science. Most applications require sampling from a DPP, and given their quantum origin, it is natural to wonder whether sampling a DPP on a quantum computer is easier than on a classical one. We focus here on DPPs over a finite state space, which are distributions over the subsets of 1,dots,N parametrized by an N× N Hermitian kernel matrix. Vanilla sampling consists in two steps, of respective costs O(N3) and O(Nr2) operations on a classical computer, where r is the rank of the kernel matrix. A large first part of the current paper consists in explaining why the state-of-the-art in quantum simulation of fermionic systems already yields quantum DPP sampling algorithms. We then modify existing quantum circuits, and discuss their insertion in a full DPP sampling pipeline that starts from practical kernel specifications. The bottom line is that, with P (classical) parallel processors, we can divide the preprocessing cost by P and build a quantum circuit with O(Nr) gates that sample a given DPP, with depth varying from O(N) to O(rlog N) depending on qubit-communication constraints on the target machine. We also connect existing work on the simulation of superconductors to Pfaffian point processes, which generalize DPPs and would be a natural addition to the machine learner's toolbox. In particular, we describe "projective" Pfaffian point processes, the cardinality of which has constant parity, almost surely. Finally, the circuits are empirically validated on a classical simulator and on 5-qubit IBM machines.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 May 2023.
Builds on
12 of 70 references.
References · 12
- 2020Determinantal Point Processes in Randomized Numerical Linear Algebracited by 41
- 2016Monte Carlo with Determinantal Point Processescited by 22
- 2018Determinantal Point Processes for Coresetscited by 18
- 2019Bayesian experimental design using regularized determinantal point processescited by 17
- 2022Quantum machine learning with subspace statescited by 12
- 2018A determinantal point process for column subset selectioncited by 9
- 2019Minimax experimental design: Bridging the gap between statistical and worst-case approaches to least squares regressioncited by 8
- 2019Approximating Orthogonal Matrices with Effective Givens Factorizationcited by 7
- 2022A Faster Sampler for Discrete Determinantal Point Processescited by 6
- 2018A Matrix Chernoff Bound for Strongly Rayleigh Distributions and Spectral Sparsifiers from a few Random Spanning Treescited by 5
- 2020Diversity sampling is an implicit regularization for kernel methodscited by 4
- 2022From point processes to quantum optics and backcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Bypassing orthogonalization in the quantum DPP samplercited by 0
- 2025Bypassing orthogonalization in the quantum DPP sampler7 Mar 2025