Small coresets via negative dependence: DPPs, linear statistics, and concentration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Determinantal point processes (DPPs) are random configurations of points with tunable negative dependence. Because sampling is tractable, DPPs are natural candidates for subsampling tasks, such as minibatch selection or coreset construction. A coreset is a subset of a (large) training set, such that minimizing an empirical loss averaged over the coreset is a controlled replacement for the intractable minimization of the original empirical loss. Typically, the control takes the form of a guarantee that the average loss over the coreset approximates the total loss uniformly across the parameter space. Recent work has provided significant empirical support in favor of using DPPs to build randomized coresets, coupled with interesting theoretical results that are suggestive but leave some key questions unanswered. In particular, the central question of whether the cardinality of a DPP-based coreset is fundamentally smaller than one based on independent sampling remained open. In this paper, we answer this question in the affirmative, demonstrating that DPPs can provably outperform independently drawn coresets. In this vein, we contribute a conceptual understanding of coreset loss as a linear statistic of the (random) coreset. We leverage this structural observation to connect the coresets problem to a more general problem of concentration phenomena for linear statistics of DPPs, wherein we obtain effective concentration inequalities that extend well-beyond the state-of-the-art, encompassing general non-projection, even non-symmetric kernels. The latter have been recently shown to be of interest in machine learning beyond coresets, but come with a limited theoretical toolbox, to the extension of which our result contributes. Finally, we are also able to address the coresets problem for vector-valued objective functions, a novelty in the coresets literature.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Nov 2024.
Builds on
13 of 31 references.
References · 13
- 2017Practical Coreset Constructions for Machine Learningcited by 75
- 2016Monte Carlo with Determinantal Point Processescited by 22
- 2020Kernel interpolation with continuous volume samplingcited by 21
- 2018Determinantal Point Processes for Coresetscited by 18
- 2019Bayesian experimental design using regularized determinantal point processescited by 17
- 2019Distributed estimation of the inverse Hessian by determinantal averagingcited by 16
- 2019Learning Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point Processescited by 15
- 2021Determinantal point processes based on orthogonal polynomials for sampling minibatches in SGDcited by 11
- 2020Scalable Learning and MAP Inference for Nonsymmetric Determinantal Point Processescited by 10
- 2018A determinantal point process for column subset selectioncited by 9
- 2022On Optimal Coreset Construction for Euclidean (k,z)-Clusteringcited by 9
- 2021Gaussian Determinantal Processes: a new model for directionality in datacited by 4
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025How Reliable is Language Model Micro-Benchmarking?cited by 8
- 2026Group-invariant Coresets for Data-efficient Active Learningcited by 0
- 2026Fast determinantal sampling on general spaces and diffusion geometrycited by 0
- 2026Beyond Worst-Case Coreset Bounds for k-Clustering via Determinantal Samplingcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Worst-Case Coreset Bounds for k-Clustering via Determinantal Sampling6 Sep 2026
- 2026Fast determinantal sampling on general spaces and diffusion geometry7 Jul 2026
- 2026Group-invariant Coresets for Data-efficient Active Learning1 Jul 2026
- 2025How Reliable is Language Model Micro-Benchmarking?9 Oct 2025