mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Repulsive Monte Carlo on the sphere for the sliced Wasserstein distance

arXiv 2509.10166 ↗First posted 12 Sep 2025stat.ML cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In this paper, we consider the problem of computing the integral of a function on the unit sphere, in any dimension, using Monte Carlo methods. Although the methods we present are general, our guiding thread is the sliced Wasserstein distance between two measures on ℝd, which is precisely an integral on the d-dimensional sphere. The sliced Wasserstein distance (SW) has gained momentum in machine learning either as a proxy to the less computationally tractable Wasserstein distance, or as a distance in its own right, due in particular to its built-in alleviation of the curse of dimensionality. There has been recent numerical benchmarks of quadratures for the sliced Wasserstein, and our viewpoint differs in that we concentrate on quadratures where the nodes are repulsive, i.e. negatively dependent. Indeed, negative dependence can bring variance reduction when the quadrature is adapted to the integration task. Our first contribution is to extract and motivate quadratures from the recent literature on determinantal point processes (DPPs) and repelled point processes, as well as repulsive quadratures from the literature specific to the sliced Wasserstein distance. We then numerically benchmark these quadratures. Moreover, we analyze the variance of the UnifOrtho estimator, an orthogonal Monte Carlo estimator. Our analysis sheds light on UnifOrtho's success for the estimation of the sliced Wasserstein in large dimensions, as well as counterexamples from the literature. Our final recommendation for the computation of the sliced Wasserstein distance is to use randomized quasi-Monte Carlo in low dimensions and UnifOrtho in large dimensions. DPP-based quadratures only shine when quasi-Monte Carlo also does, while repelled quadratures show moderate variance reduction in general, but more theoretical effort is needed to make them robust.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Sep 2025.

Builds on

22 of 67 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015ShapeNet: An Information-Rich 3D Model Repositorycited by 2,897
  2. 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 780
  3. 2018Generative Modeling using the Sliced Wasserstein Distancecited by 108
  4. 2018Sliced-Wasserstein Flows: Nonparametric Generative Modeling via Optimal Transport and Diffusionscited by 77
  5. 2023Monte Carlo guided Diffusion for Bayesian linear inverse problemscited by 66
  6. 2015Sliced Wasserstein Kernels for Probability Distributionscited by 65
  7. 2020Sparse Gaussian Processes with Spherical Harmonic Featurescited by 43
  8. 2019Orthogonal Estimation of Wasserstein Distancescited by 32
  9. 2024Sliced-Wasserstein Distances and Flows on Cartan-Hadamard Manifoldscited by 28
  10. 2019Minimax Confidence Intervals for the Sliced Wasserstein Distancecited by 24
  11. 2016Monte Carlo with Determinantal Point Processescited by 22
  12. 2023Quasi-Monte Carlo for 3D Sliced Wassersteincited by 22
10 more
  1. 2020Kernel interpolation with continuous volume samplingcited by 21
  2. 2021Efficient Gradient Flows in Sliced-Wasserstein Spacecited by 21
  3. 2021Differentially Private Sliced Wasserstein Distancecited by 19
  4. 2024Diffusion posterior sampling for simulation-based inference in tall data settingscited by 19
  5. 2023Sliced Wasserstein Estimation with Control Variatescited by 16
  6. 2020Demystifying Orthogonal Monte Carlo and Beyondcited by 8
  7. 2024Sliced-Wasserstein Estimation with Spherical Harmonics as Control Variatescited by 8
  8. 2025A User's Guide to Sampling Strategies for Sliced Optimal Transportcited by 7
  9. 2022A Faster Sampler for Discrete Determinantal Point Processescited by 6
  10. 2023Repelled point processes with application to numerical integrationcited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.