Beyond Worst-Case Coreset Bounds for k-Clustering via Determinantal Sampling
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Massive datasets in modern machine learning have made data reduction a central challenge, particularly for clustering tasks where memory and computational constraints demand compact yet faithful summaries. A standard approach is to construct an textitε-coreset: a small weighted subset that approximately preserves the clustering cost for every plausible choice of centers. For the textit(k,z)-clustering problem, existing worst-case bounds on coreset size are essentially tight, ruling out substantially smaller coresets in general. However, such worst-case instances are often unrepresentative of real-world data. In this work, we show that significantly smaller coresets are possible under mild and natural assumptions on the underlying data distribution. We introduce a new correlated sampling framework, called textitdeterminantal sampling, based on a novel application of determinantal point processes. Using this framework, we obtain an efficiently constructible varepsilon-coreset for (k,z)-clustering in mathbb Rd whose dependence on 1/varepsilon has exponent strictly smaller than 2 when d is fixed. This improves over the worst-case varepsilon-2 barrier under our beyond-worst-case assumptions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result that provably surpasses these lower bounds through beyond-worst-case assumptions. Finally, we validate our approach on synthetic and real-world benchmark datasets, where it consistently achieves smaller coresets than existing state-of-the-art methods, even without explicitly enforcing the assumptions used in the analysis.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2026.
Builds on
23 of 57 references.
References · 23
- 2018Turning Big data into tiny data: Constant-size coresets for k-means, PCA and projective clusteringcited by 94
- 2017Practical Coreset Constructions for Machine Learningcited by 75
- 2018On Coresets for Logistic Regressioncited by 65
- 2017Training Gaussian Mixture Models at Scale via Coresetscited by 38
- 2021A New Coreset Framework for Clusteringcited by 38
- 2016New Frameworks for Offline and Streaming Coreset Constructionscited by 37
- 2020Coresets for Clustering in Euclidean Spaces: Importance Sampling is Nearly Optimalcited by 31
- 2021Coresets for Classification -- Simplified and Strengthenedcited by 28
- 2013Distributed k-Means and k-Median Clustering on General Topologiescited by 24
- 2022Towards Optimal Lower Bounds for k-median and k-means Coresetscited by 23
- 2016Monte Carlo with Determinantal Point Processescited by 22
- 2018Determinantal Point Processes for Coresetscited by 18
11 more
- 2022Coresets for Vertical Federated Learning: Regularized Linear Regression and K-Means Clusteringcited by 14
- 2017On the Local Structure of Stable Clustering Instancescited by 13
- 2021Determinantal point processes based on orthogonal polynomials for sampling minibatches in SGDcited by 11
- 2020Fully-Dynamic Coresetscited by 9
- 2022On Optimal Coreset Construction for Euclidean (k,z)-Clusteringcited by 9
- 2021Robust and Fully-Dynamic Coreset for Continuous-and-Bounded Learning (With Outliers) Problemscited by 6
- 2024Sensitivity Sampling for k-Means: Worst Case and Stability Optimal Coreset Boundscited by 5
- 2024Small coresets via negative dependence: DPPs, linear statistics, and concentrationcited by 4
- 2023On Coresets for Clustering in Small Dimensional Euclidean Spacescited by 3
- 2025Negative Dependence as a toolbox for machine learning : review and new developmentscited by 1
- 2025Generalization Performance of Ensemble Clustering: From Theory to Algorithmcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.