mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Beyond Worst-Case Coreset Bounds for k-Clustering via Determinantal Sampling

arXiv 2609.06394 ↗First posted 6 Sep 2026stat.ML cs.LG math.PRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Massive datasets in modern machine learning have made data reduction a central challenge, particularly for clustering tasks where memory and computational constraints demand compact yet faithful summaries. A standard approach is to construct an textitε-coreset: a small weighted subset that approximately preserves the clustering cost for every plausible choice of centers. For the textit(k,z)-clustering problem, existing worst-case bounds on coreset size are essentially tight, ruling out substantially smaller coresets in general. However, such worst-case instances are often unrepresentative of real-world data. In this work, we show that significantly smaller coresets are possible under mild and natural assumptions on the underlying data distribution. We introduce a new correlated sampling framework, called textitdeterminantal sampling, based on a novel application of determinantal point processes. Using this framework, we obtain an efficiently constructible varepsilon-coreset for (k,z)-clustering in mathbb Rd whose dependence on 1/varepsilon has exponent strictly smaller than 2 when d is fixed. This improves over the worst-case varepsilon-2 barrier under our beyond-worst-case assumptions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result that provably surpasses these lower bounds through beyond-worst-case assumptions. Finally, we validate our approach on synthetic and real-world benchmark datasets, where it consistently achieves smaller coresets than existing state-of-the-art methods, even without explicitly enforcing the assumptions used in the analysis.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Sep 2026.

Builds on

23 of 57 references.

References · 23

  1. 2018Turning Big data into tiny data: Constant-size coresets for k-means, PCA and projective clusteringcited by 94
  2. 2017Practical Coreset Constructions for Machine Learningcited by 75
  3. 2018On Coresets for Logistic Regressioncited by 65
  4. 2017Training Gaussian Mixture Models at Scale via Coresetscited by 38
  5. 2021A New Coreset Framework for Clusteringcited by 38
  6. 2016New Frameworks for Offline and Streaming Coreset Constructionscited by 37
  7. 2020Coresets for Clustering in Euclidean Spaces: Importance Sampling is Nearly Optimalcited by 31
  8. 2021Coresets for Classification -- Simplified and Strengthenedcited by 28
  9. 2013Distributed k-Means and k-Median Clustering on General Topologiescited by 24
  10. 2022Towards Optimal Lower Bounds for k-median and k-means Coresetscited by 23
  11. 2016Monte Carlo with Determinantal Point Processescited by 22
  12. 2018Determinantal Point Processes for Coresetscited by 18
11 more
  1. 2022Coresets for Vertical Federated Learning: Regularized Linear Regression and K-Means Clusteringcited by 14
  2. 2017On the Local Structure of Stable Clustering Instancescited by 13
  3. 2021Determinantal point processes based on orthogonal polynomials for sampling minibatches in SGDcited by 11
  4. 2020Fully-Dynamic Coresetscited by 9
  5. 2022On Optimal Coreset Construction for Euclidean (k,z)-Clusteringcited by 9
  6. 2021Robust and Fully-Dynamic Coreset for Continuous-and-Bounded Learning (With Outliers) Problemscited by 6
  7. 2024Sensitivity Sampling for k-Means: Worst Case and Stability Optimal Coreset Boundscited by 5
  8. 2024Small coresets via negative dependence: DPPs, linear statistics, and concentrationcited by 4
  9. 2023On Coresets for Clustering in Small Dimensional Euclidean Spacescited by 3
  10. 2025Negative Dependence as a toolbox for machine learning : review and new developmentscited by 1
  11. 2025Generalization Performance of Ensemble Clustering: From Theory to Algorithmcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.