Optimal Top-k Identification from Pairwise Comparisons
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the active learning problem of fixed-confidence top-k identification from noisy pairwise comparisons. In this problem, an algorithm sequentially chooses pairs of items to compare, observes the outcomes, and stops when it can return the set of top-k items with error probability at most δ. The objective is to design such a δ-correct procedure that minimizes the expected number of comparisons (the sample complexity). This problem falls within the broader literature on fixed-confidence pure exploration in bandit models, where a common target is asymptotic optimality: the algorithm's expected sample complexity matches the information theoretic lower bound as δ → 0. Asymptotically optimal procedures have been developed for a range of fixed-confidence pure-exploration problems, however to the best of our knowledge, for top-1, or more generally top-k identification from pairwise comparisons under latent utility models an asymptotically optimal algorithm has not been established. In this setting, we develop such an algorithm. We characterize the structure of the lower bound and formulate it as a saddle-point problem. This structure enables a computationally efficient primal-dual procedure that learns the asymptotically optimal comparison allocation online. We then construct an adaptive comparison-allocation algorithm that tracks the allocation learned by the primal-dual procedure and prove it is asymptotically optimal.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2026.
Builds on
22 of 36 references.
References · 22
- 2024Chatbot Arena: An Open Platform for Evaluating LLMs by Human Preferencecited by 1,151
- 2019Introduction to Online Convex Optimizationcited by 793
- 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
- 2016Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidencecited by 233
- 2018Preference-based Online Learning with Dueling Bandits: A Surveycited by 100
- 2020Optimal Best-arm Identification in Linear Banditscited by 70
- 2019Non-Asymptotic Pure Exploration by Solving Gamescited by 62
- 2020Gamification of Pure Exploration for Linear Banditscited by 61
- 2017Spectral Method and Regularized MLE Are Both Optimal for Top-K Rankingcited by 46
- 2015Spectral MLE: Top-K Rank Aggregation from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 34
- 2015Stochastically Transitive Models for Pairwise Comparisons: Statistical and Computational Issuescited by 32
- 2018PAC Battling Bandits in the Plackett-Luce Modelcited by 27
10 more
- 2014Minimax-optimal Inference from Partial Rankingscited by 22
- 2018PAC Ranking from Pairwise and Listwise Queries: Lower Bounds and Upper Boundscited by 17
- 2017A Nearly Instance Optimal Algorithm for Top-k Ranking under the Multinomial Logit Modelcited by 12
- 2016Data-driven Rank Breaking for Efficient Rank Aggregationcited by 10
- 2016Top-K Ranking from Pairwise Comparisons: When Spectral Ranking is Optimalcited by 9
- 2019From PAC to Instance-Optimal Sample Complexity in the Plackett-Luce Modelcited by 9
- 2020The Sample Complexity of Best-k Items Selection from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 9
- 2023Crowdsourcing subjective annotations using pairwise comparisons reduces bias and error compared to the majority-vote methodcited by 9
- 2019Sorted Top-k in Roundscited by 4
- 2018Dueling Bandits with Qualitative Feedbackcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.