Fair Active Ranking from Pairwise Preferences
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate the problem of probably approximately correct and fair (PACF) ranking of items by adaptively evoking pairwise comparisons. Given a set of n items that belong to disjoint groups, our goal is to find an (ε, δ)-PACF-Ranking according to a fair objective function that we propose. We assume access to an oracle, wherein, for each query, the learner can choose a pair of items and receive stochastic winner feedback from the oracle. Our proposed objective function asks to minimize the ℓq norm of the error of the groups, where the error of a group is the ℓp norm of the error of all the items within that group, for p, q ≥ 1. This generalizes the objective function of ε-Best-Ranking, proposed by Saha & Gopalan (2019). By adopting our objective function, we gain the flexibility to explore fundamental fairness concepts like equal or proportionate errors within a unified framework. Adjusting parameters p and q allows tailoring to specific fairness preferences. We present both group-blind and group-aware algorithms and analyze their sample complexity. We provide matching lower bounds up to certain logarithmic factors for group-blind algorithms. For a restricted class of group-aware algorithms, we show that we can get reasonable lower bounds. We conduct comprehensive experiments on both real-world and synthetic datasets to complement our theoretical findings.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Feb 2024.
Builds on
14 of 34 references.
References · 14
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2014On the Complexity of Best Arm Identification in Multi-Armed Bandit Modelscited by 280
- 2018Fairness of Exposure in Rankingscited by 189
- 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
- 2017Ranking with Fairness Constraintscited by 78
- 2021Fairness in Rankings and Recommendations: An Overviewcited by 62
- 2020Fair clustering via equitable group representationscited by 43
- 2018Selection Problems in the Presence of Implicit Biascited by 29
- 2020Interventions for Ranking in the Presence of Implicit Biascited by 27
- 2021Fairness in Ranking under Uncertaintycited by 27
- 2018Active Ranking with Subset-wise Preferencescited by 21
- 2022Fair Ranking with Noisy Protected Attributescited by 17
2 more
- 2016Data-driven Rank Breaking for Efficient Rank Aggregationcited by 10
- 2022Socially Fair Center-based and Linear Subspace Clusteringcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.