On the identifiability of mixtures of ranking models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Mixtures of ranking models are standard tools for ranking problems. However, even the fundamental question of parameter identifiability is not fully understood: the identifiability of a mixture model with two Bradley-Terry-Luce (BTL) components has remained open. In this work, we show that popular mixtures of ranking models with two components (BTL, multinomial logistic models with slates of size 3, or Plackett-Luce) are generically identifiable, i.e., the ground-truth parameters can be identified except when they are from a pathological subset of measure zero. We provide a framework for verifying the number of solutions in a general family of polynomial systems using algebraic geometry, and apply it to these mixtures of ranking models to establish generic identifiability. The framework can be applied more broadly to other learning models and may be of independent interest.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jan 2022.
Builds on
10 of 57 references.
References · 10
- 2018Learning Mixtures of Linear Regressions with Nearly Optimal Complexitycited by 37
- 2015Spectral MLE: Top-K Rank Aggregation from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 34
- 2016Learning Mixtures of Plackett-Luce Modelscited by 19
- 2018Efficiently Learning Mixtures of Mallows Modelscited by 13
- 2016Data-driven Rank Breaking for Efficient Rank Aggregationcited by 10
- 2014Learning Mixed Multinomial Logit Model from Ordinal Datacited by 7
- 2020Learning Mixtures of Permutations: Groups of Pairwise Comparisons and Combinatorial Method of Momentscited by 6
- 2015Clustering and Inference From Pairwise Comparisonscited by 4
- 2020Learning an arbitrary mixture of two multinomial logitscited by 3
- 2018Composite Marginal Likelihood Methods for Random Utility Modelscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2025Distortion of AI Alignment: Does Preference Optimization Optimize for Preferences?cited by 20
- 2025Direct Alignment with Heterogeneous Preferencescited by 19
- 2025Clone-Robust AI Alignmentcited by 7
- 2023Sharp analysis of EM for learning mixtures of pairwise differencescited by 1
- 2026A Revealed Preference Framework for AI Alignmentcited by 1
- 2024CURATRON: Complete and Robust Preference Data for Rigorous Alignment of Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Distortion of AI Alignment Revisited: RLHF is a Decent Utilitarian Alignercited by 0
- 2026Distortion of AI Alignment Revisited: RLHF is a Decent Utilitarian Aligner11 Sep 2026
- 2026A Revealed Preference Framework for AI Alignment29 Mar 2026
- 2025Distortion of AI Alignment: Does Preference Optimization Optimize for Preferences?29 May 2025
- 2025Direct Alignment with Heterogeneous Preferences22 Feb 2025
- 2025Clone-Robust AI Alignment16 Jan 2025
- 2024CURATRON: Complete and Robust Preference Data for Rigorous Alignment of Large Language Models5 Mar 2024
- 2023Sharp analysis of EM for learning mixtures of pairwise differences20 Feb 2023