ProtoArena: Can AI Agents Discover and Exploit Real-World Cross-Component Protocol Vulnerabilities?
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly used for vulnerability analysis, yet existing benchmarks provide limited coverage of exploitation that depends on interactions among network protocol components. Such vulnerabilities arise from inconsistencies in message interpretation, timing, state, or trust assumptions across participants. We introduce ProtoArena, a black-box, multi-component, dynamic benchmark with 80 cross-component vulnerability-exploitation environments spanning 11 protocol and application domains and 7 attack categories. Tasks are primarily informed by published protocol-attack mechanisms. Agents interact with running systems through scoped interfaces to achieve security-effect objectives without target source code. Three information levels assess guided reproduction, exploitation with mechanism and topology context, and effect-directed black-box exploration. A hybrid verifier combines rule-based checks with LLM review of independently collected traffic and logs. We evaluate five LLMs. Claude Opus 4.8 achieves the highest observed success rates: 48.8% under L1 guidance and 12.5% under effect-directed black-box L3. In a separate DNSBomb optimization experiment, it achieves a peak downstream-response to average query-input byte-rate ratio exceeding 171,000 times. The results show that agents can achieve verifiable exploitation effects in some cross-component environments, but success with limited black-box information remains low and varies across domains and attack categories. All experiments use controlled, explicitly authorized targets; they do not test production systems or disclose previously unknown vulnerabilities.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Oct 2026.
Builds on
9 of 28 references.
Closest ancestors · 3
Same direction, newest first
- 2026ExploitBench: A Capability Ladder Benchmark for LLM Cybersecurity Agents13 May
- 2026ExploitGym: Can AI Agents Turn Security Vulnerabilities into Real Attacks?11 May
- 2025CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilities21 Mar
Other references · 6
- 2023SWE-bench: Can Language Models Resolve Real-World GitHub Issues?cited by 3,373
- 2023InterCode: Standardizing and Benchmarking Interactive Coding with Execution Feedbackcited by 238
- 2024Cybench: A Framework for Evaluating Cybersecurity Capabilities and Risks of Language Modelscited by 164
- 2023Purple Llama CyberSecEval: A Secure Coding Benchmark for Language Modelscited by 138
- 2024NYU CTF Bench: A Scalable Open-Source Benchmark Dataset for Evaluating LLMs in Offensive Securitycited by 93
- 2025CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scalecited by 78
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025From Prompt Injections to Protocol Exploits: Threats in LLM-Powered AI Agents Workflows
- 2026On Understanding, Identifying, and Mitigating Vulnerabilities in Agentic Large Language Models
- 2025Bridging AI and Software Security: A Comparative Vulnerability Assessment of LLM Agent Deployment Paradigms
- 2025DoomArena: A framework for Testing AI Agents Against Evolving Security Threats
- 2026Systematic Capability Benchmarking of Frontier Large Language Models for Offensive Cyber Tasks
- 2026PrivEscalate: Measuring and Augmenting the Threat of LLM-Automated Linux Privilege Escalation ↗
- 2026CWE-bench: Refocusing Agentic Security from Exploitation to Defense
- 2026Agent-Canary-Mas: End-to-End Evaluation of Protocol Risk in Long-Horizon Multi-Agent Systems