mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Effect of Spherical Parameter Space on Number of Non-Forgetting Tasks and Capacity of Continual Learning

arXiv 2610.17453 ↗First posted 12 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.IT math.ITcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a continuous learning formulation for T non-forgetting tasks with the spherical parameter space mathbbSd-1(√d) in asymptotic regime drightarrow ∞. Each task i has an optimum bmThetai, minimizing its corresponding loss function Ri(bmw) on sphere. We reduce each task i to an acceptable loss region modeled by a geodesic ball B_bmThetai(ri(d)) on mathbbSd-1(√d) centered at bmThetai with radius ri(d). To model task dependencies (similarities), task optima bmThetai are distributed by a Neyman-Scott clustered point process Phi. Cluster centers bmYjj=1Np form a homogeneous Poisson point process on sphere, while intra-cluster task optima follow a von Mises-Fisher distribution with mean bmYj and concentration kappa. Each task t∈ 1, ..., T learning algorithm is considered to be a channel Qt(dbmwt | bmwt-1, Kt-1(bmθ1:t-1), bmθt), where bmWt is the learned parameter of task t and Kt-1(bmTheta1:t-1)=bigcapi=1t-1B_bmThetai(ri(d)). Since in continual learning, the learner does not need to reach bmThetat exactly to successfully learn task t, to avoid forgetting as well as reliable learning, it only needs for the learned parameter vector bmWt to enter B_bmThetat(rt(d)) cap Kt-1(bmTheta1:t-1). Using this model, we derive an upper bound on T ensuring mathbbP[KT(bmTheta1:T) neq emptyset] rightarrow 1 as drightarrow ∞ and kappa/d rightarrow α, where α>0 is a constant. Finally, for T tasks sampled uniformly from Phi, we derive an upper bound for total information theoretic capacity under the non-forgetting constraint for each task.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Oct 2026.

Builds on

18 of 30 references.

References · 18

  1. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  2. 2018Continual Lifelong Learning with Neural Networks: A Reviewcited by 1,330
  3. 2023A Comprehensive Survey of Continual Learning: Theory, Method and Applicationcited by 872
  4. 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 369
  5. 2024Continual Learning of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 234
  6. 2020Understanding the Role of Training Regimes in Continual Learningcited by 180
  7. 2020Linear Mode Connectivity in Multitask and Continual Learningcited by 145
  8. 2020Optimal Continual Learning has Perfect Memory and is NP-hardcited by 87
  9. 2023Theory on Forgetting and Generalization of Continual Learningcited by 72
  10. 2019Hierarchically Structured Meta-learningcited by 68
  11. 2022Continual evaluation for lifelong learning: Identifying the stability gapcited by 56
  12. 2023Exploring Data Geometry for Continual Learningcited by 15
6 more
  1. 2022Continual Learning with Guarantees via Weight Interval Constraintscited by 11
  2. 2026Putting a Face to Forgetting: Continual Learning meets Mechanistic Interpretabilitycited by 4
  3. 2026Subspace Geometry Governs Catastrophic Forgetting in Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 4
  4. 2026Fisher-Orthogonal Projected Natural Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 2
  5. 2026Exploring the Impact of Parameter Update Magnitude on Forgetting and Generalization of Continual Learningcited by 1
  6. 2026Recovery Guarantees for Continual Learning of Dependent Tasks: Memory, Data-Dependent Regularization, and Data-Dependent Weightscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.