mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Subspace Geometry Governs Catastrophic Forgetting in Low-Rank Adaptation

arXiv 2603.02224 ↗First posted 10 Feb 2026cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) has emerged as a parameter-efficient approach for adapting large pre-trained models, yet its behavior under continual learning remains poorly understood. We present a geometric theory characterizing catastrophic forgetting in LoRA through the lens of gradient subspace interactions. Our central finding is that forgetting is governed by a simple geometric law: F = α(1 - cos2θmin) + β, where θmin is the minimum principal angle between task gradient subspaces. This formulation reveals an approximate rank-invariance property, at high subspace angles, forgetting becomes largely independent of the adapter rank (coefficient of variation ≈ 0.8% in controlled synthetic settings; CV ≈ 10-19% on real benchmarks, suggesting this is regime-dependent rather than absolute). We validate our theory on synthetic tasks (r=0.994 correlation), Split-CIFAR100 with ViT-LoRA, and sequential GLUE with RoBERTa-LoRA. Our analysis reconciles seemingly contradictory findings in the literature: we show that rank affects forgetting only when task subspaces are similar (low angle), while orthogonal methods like O-LoRA provide minimal benefit when natural orthogonality is already high. These insights provide principled guidance for continual learning with parameter-efficient fine-tuning.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Feb 2026.

Builds on

21 of 28 references.

References · 21

  1. 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
  2. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,355
  3. 2016iCaRL: Incremental Classifier and Representation Learningcited by 2,313
  4. 2016Progressive Neural Networkscited by 1,332
  5. 2024DoRA: Weight-Decomposed Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 740
  6. 2018Overcoming catastrophic forgetting with hard attention to the taskcited by 672
  7. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 658
  8. 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
  9. 2019Orthogonal Gradient Descent for Continual Learningcited by 361
  10. 2021Gradient Projection Memory for Continual Learningcited by 338
  11. 2024LoRA Learns Less and Forgets Lesscited by 313
  12. 2023Orthogonal Subspace Learning for Language Model Continual Learningcited by 296
9 more
  1. 2018Gradient Descent Happens in a Tiny Subspacecited by 208
  2. 2024InfLoRA: Interference-Free Low-Rank Adaptation for Continual Learningcited by 189
  3. 2026KeepLoRA: Continual Learning with Residual Gradient Adaptationcited by 18
  4. 2025Sculpting Subspaces: Constrained Full Fine-Tuning in LLMs for Continual Learningcited by 15
  5. 2026Disentangling Task Conflicts in Multi-Task LoRA via Orthogonal Gradient Projectioncited by 8
  6. 2025Orthogonal Low-rank Adaptation in Lie Groups for Continual Learning of Large Language Modelscited by 7
  7. 2025PLAN: Proactive Low-Rank Allocation for Continual Learningcited by 5
  8. 2026GRIT -- Geometry-Aware PEFT with K-FACPreconditioning, Fisher-Guided Reprojection, andDynamic Rank Adaptationcited by 3
  9. 2026Why LoRA Resists Label Noise: A Theoretical Framework for Noise-Robust Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.

3 papers.