mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding and Mitigating Spurious Signal Amplification in Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for Math Reasoning

arXiv 2604.21327 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2026cs.LG cs.AI cs.CLcited by 1

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Test-time reinforcement learning (TTRL) always adapts models at inference time via pseudo-labeling, leaving it vulnerable to spurious optimization signals from label noise. Through an empirical study, we observe that responses with medium consistency form an ambiguity region and constitute the primary source of reward noise. Crucially, we find that such spurious signals can be even amplified through group-relative advantage estimation. Motivated by these findings, we propose a unified framework, Debiased and Denoised test-time Reinforcement Learning (DDRL), to mitigate spurious signals. Concretely, DDRL first applies a frequency-based sampling strategy to exclude ambiguous samples while maintaining a balanced set of positive and negative examples. It then adopts a debiased advantage estimation with fixed advantages, removing the bias introduced by group-relative policy optimization. Finally, DDRL incorporates a consensus-based off-policy refinement stage, which leverages the rejection-sampled dataset to enable efficient and stable model updates. Experiments on three large language models across multiple mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate that DDRL consistently outperforms existing TTRL baselines. The code will soon be released at https://github.com/yuyongcan/DDRL.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 24 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2026.

Builds on

24 of 36 references.

Closest ancestors · 11

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2025SPINE: Token-Selective Test-Time Reinforcement Learning with Entropy-Band Regularization22 Nov
  2. 2025RESTRAIN: From Spurious Votes to Signals -- Self-Driven RL with Self-Penalization2 Oct
  3. 2025Consistent Paths Lead to Truth: Self-Rewarding Reinforcement Learning for LLM Reasoning10 Jun
  4. 2025Maximizing Confidence Alone Improves Reasoning28 May
  5. 2025First SFT, Second RL, Third UPT: Continual Improving Multi-Modal LLM Reasoning via Unsupervised Post-Training28 May
  6. 2025Learning to Reason without External Rewards26 May
  7. 2025AceReason-Nemotron: Advancing Math and Code Reasoning through Reinforcement Learning22 May
  8. 2025TTRL: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning22 Apr
  9. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?18 Apr
  10. 2025DAPO: An Open-Source LLM Reinforcement Learning System at Scale18 Mar
  11. 2024Tulu 3: Pushing Frontiers in Open Language Model Post-Training22 Nov

Other references · 13

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  2. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  3. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  4. 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 1,980
  5. 2024OpenAI o1 System Cardcited by 1,220
  6. 2024Qwen2.5-Math Technical Report: Toward Mathematical Expert Model via Self-Improvementcited by 1,057
  7. 2025A Survey on Test-Time Scaling in Large Language Models: What, How, Where, and How Well?cited by 215
  8. 2023Cumulative Reasoning with Large Language Modelscited by 94
  9. 2025ETTRL: Balancing Exploration and Exploitation in LLM Test-Time Reinforcement Learning Via Entropy Mechanismcited by 35
  10. 2024Large Language Models Can Self-Improve in Long-context Reasoningcited by 29
  11. 2023Benchmarking Test-Time Adaptation against Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 17
  12. 2025Reassessing the Role of Supervised Fine-Tuning: An Empirical Study in VLM Reasoningcited by 4
1 more
  1. 2025Test-Time Immunization: A Universal Defense Framework Against Jailbreaks for (Multimodal) Large Language Modelscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Amplification Effects in Test-Time Reinforcement Learning: Safety and Reasoning Vulnerabilities
  2. 2026Detecting and Mitigating the Correct-Answer Extinction Window in Test-Time Reinforcement Learning with Majority Voting
  3. 2025VAR-MATH: Probing True Mathematical Reasoning in LLMS via Symbolic Multi-Instance Benchmarks
  4. 2025Noise-corrected GRPO: From Noisy Rewards to Unbiased Gradients
  5. 2026TTPO: Test-Time Policy Optimization
  6. 2026Tool Verification for Test-Time Reinforcement Learning
  7. 2026What If Consensus Lies? Selective-Complementary Reinforcement Learning at Test Time
  8. 2025Mitigating Think-Answer Mismatch in LLM Reasoning Through Noise-Aware Advantage Reweighting