Adversarial Detection for Pre-trained Classifiers via Lipschitz-Margin Analysis with Certification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep classifiers deployed in safety-critical services like autonomous-driving perception remain vulnerable to small adversarial perturbations. Certified ℓ2 defenses today face a costly trade-off: randomized smoothing (RS) requires hundreds of noisy queries per input, while Lipschitz networks (LN) constrain the architecture and sacrifice clean accuracy. We take a detection-oriented approach instead: rather than certifying that predictions are invariant inside an ℓ2 ball, we certify that adversarial inputs within an ℓ2 ball are detected --- a guarantee aligned with security-critical deployments where missing an attack is costlier than flagging a clean input. To realize this, we prove a Lipschitz-margin reduction from certified ℓ2 robustness to certified detection, which reduces the problem to handling a single Lipschitz constant L. We introduce two detector families: mathbbDAdv, which estimates L from a single defender-side perturbed pair, and mathbbDlc, which augments that pair with a local margin centroid to keep the estimate above what the certificate requires. Both deploy on any pretrained classifier without retraining. With a valid global bound, the detector is fully certified at that radius; with a local estimate L', certification is sample-wise and applies only when our certified condition holds. Across MNIST, CIFAR-10, and ImageNet-1k on four backbones (LeNet-5, VGG16, ResNet-50, ViT-B/16), our detectors match or outperform five baselines (CTT, SortNet, CRM, ContraNet, A2D). For CIFAR-10 with 1-Lipschitz SortNet, our reduction delivers 100% certified detection at the lowest FPR among compared certified detectors; on the standard CIFAR-10 VGG16, our detectors reject all evaluated in-budget adversarial examples, with 62-82% both rejected and formally certified.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 44 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Oct 2026.
Builds on
44 of 60 references.
References · 44
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,364
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,998
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,769
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2017Spectrally-normalized margin bounds for neural networkscited by 686
- 2019Adversarial Training for Free!cited by 643
- 2020On Adaptive Attacks to Adversarial Example Defensescited by 555
- 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
- 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 330
- 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 320
32 more
- 2019Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Images, Graphs and Text: A Reviewcited by 237
- 2018Lipschitz-Margin Training: Scalable Certification of Perturbation Invariance for Deep Neural Networkscited by 195
- 2017Formal Guarantees on the Robustness of a Classifier against Adversarial Manipulationcited by 185
- 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 180
- 2020The Lipschitz Constant of Self-Attentioncited by 174
- 2020Randomized Smoothing of All Shapes and Sizescited by 147
- 2018Scaling provable adversarial defensescited by 143
- 2022(Certified!!) Adversarial Robustness for Free!cited by 132
- 2018Stochastic subgradient method converges on tame functionscited by 124
- 2016Robust Large Margin Deep Neural Networkscited by 118
- 2021Globally-Robust Neural Networkscited by 108
- 2020SoK: Certified Robustness for Deep Neural Networkscited by 105
- 2019Preventing Gradient Attenuation in Lipschitz Constrained Convolutional Networkscited by 87
- 2021Gradient Descent on Two-layer Nets: Margin Maximization and Simplicity Biascited by 83
- 2022MM-BD: Post-Training Detection of Backdoor Attacks with Arbitrary Backdoor Pattern Types Using a Maximum Margin Statisticcited by 55
- 2021Adversarial Example Detection for DNN Models: A Review and Experimental Comparisoncited by 52
- 2022Certified Training: Small Boxes are All You Needcited by 52
- 2022Rethinking Lipschitz Neural Networks and Certified Robustness: A Boolean Function Perspectivecited by 51
- 2021Detecting Adversarial Examples Is (Nearly) As Hard As Classifying Themcited by 48
- 2023Exploring and Exploiting Decision Boundary Dynamics for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 36
- 2022LOT: Layer-wise Orthogonal Training on Improving ℓ2 Certified Robustnesscited by 33
- 2019Deep Neural Rejection against Adversarial Examplescited by 32
- 2023Certified Robustness via Dynamic Margin Maximization and Improved Lipschitz Regularizationcited by 21
- 2021CC-Cert: A Probabilistic Approach to Certify General Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 19
- 2022What You See is Not What the Network Infers: Detecting Adversarial Examples Based on Semantic Contradictioncited by 11
- 2023The Lipschitz-Variance-Margin Tradeoff for Enhanced Randomized Smoothingcited by 8
- 2019Adversarial Margin Maximization Networkscited by 4
- 2020Towards Certifiable Adversarial Sample Detectioncited by 4
- 2024PASA: Attack Agnostic Unsupervised Adversarial Detection using Prediction & Attribution Sensitivity Analysiscited by 3
- 2024CrossCert: A Cross-Checking Detection Approach to Patch Robustness Certification for Deep Learning Modelscited by 3
- 2025Pulling Back the Curtain: Unsupervised Adversarial Detection via Contrastive Auxiliary Networkscited by 2
- 2025From Pixels to Trajectory: Universal Adversarial Example Detection via Temporal Imprintscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.