From Pixels to Trajectory: Universal Adversarial Example Detection via Temporal Imprints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
For the first time, we unveil discernible temporal (or historical) trajectory imprints resulting from adversarial example (AE) attacks. Standing in contrast to existing studies all focusing on spatial (or static) imprints within the targeted underlying victim models, we present a fresh temporal paradigm for understanding these attacks. Of paramount discovery is that these imprints are encapsulated within a single loss metric, spanning universally across diverse tasks such as classification and regression, and modalities including image, text, and audio. Recognizing the distinct nature of loss between adversarial and clean examples, we exploit this temporal imprint for AE detection by proposing TRAIT (TRaceable Adversarial temporal trajectory ImprinTs). TRAIT operates under minimal assumptions without prior knowledge of attacks, thereby framing the detection challenge as a one-class classification problem. However, detecting AEs is still challenged by significant overlaps between the constructed synthetic losses of adversarial and clean examples due to the absence of ground truth for incoming inputs. TRAIT addresses this challenge by converting the synthetic loss into a spectrum signature, using the technique of Fast Fourier Transform to highlight the discrepancies, drawing inspiration from the temporal nature of the imprints, analogous to time-series signals. Across 12 AE attacks including SMACK (USENIX Sec'2023), TRAIT demonstrates consistent outstanding performance across comprehensively evaluated modalities, tasks, datasets, and model architectures. In all scenarios, TRAIT achieves an AE detection accuracy exceeding 97%, often around 99%, while maintaining a false rejection rate of 1%. TRAIT remains effective under the formulated strong adaptive attacks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 46 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Mar 2025.
Builds on
46 of 105 references.
References · 46
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural Networkscited by 2,976
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2019Common Voice: A Massively-Multilingual Speech Corpuscited by 1,358
34 more
- 2019Universal Adversarial Triggers for Attacking and Analyzing NLPcited by 709
- 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 641
- 2017Countering Adversarial Images using Input Transformationscited by 517
- 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
- 2017Decision-Based Adversarial Attacks: Reliable Attacks Against Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 459
- 2017Mitigating Adversarial Effects Through Randomizationcited by 382
- 2018Defense-GAN: Protecting Classifiers Against Adversarial Attacks Using Generative Modelscited by 362
- 2018Black-box Generation of Adversarial Text Sequences to Evade Deep Learning Classifierscited by 341
- 2018Adversarial Attack on Graph Structured Datacited by 300
- 2018Characterizing Adversarial Subspaces Using Local Intrinsic Dimensionalitycited by 280
- 2017MagNet: a Two-Pronged Defense against Adversarial Examplescited by 268
- 2021Anti-Backdoor Learning: Training Clean Models on Poisoned Datacited by 258
- 2017Detecting Adversarial Samples from Artifactscited by 244
- 2019Adversarial Attacks and Defenses in Images, Graphs and Text: A Reviewcited by 234
- 2018Deep k-Nearest Neighbors: Towards Confident, Interpretable and Robust Deep Learningcited by 203
- 2016A study of the effect of JPG compression on adversarial imagescited by 196
- 2017On the (Statistical) Detection of Adversarial Examplescited by 180
- 2018Physical Adversarial Examples for Object Detectorscited by 163
- 2020Backdoor Attacks and Countermeasures on Deep Learning: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 120
- 2021Robust Learning Meets Generative Models: Can Proxy Distributions Improve Adversarial Robustness?cited by 113
- 2018Feature Distillation: DNN-Oriented JPEG Compression Against Adversarial Examplescited by 98
- 2020Towards Robust LiDAR-based Perception in Autonomous Driving: General Black-box Adversarial Sensor Attack and Countermeasurescited by 95
- 2020Adversarial Machine Learning in Image Classification: A Survey Towards the Defender's Perspectivecited by 58
- 2022FedRecover: Recovering from Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning using Historical Informationcited by 53
- 2020SoK: The Faults in our ASRs: An Overview of Attacks against Automatic Speech Recognition and Speaker Identification Systemscited by 46
- 2019Gotta Catch 'Em All: Using Honeypots to Catch Adversarial Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 40
- 2022DISCO: Adversarial Defense with Local Implicit Functionscited by 33
- 2021Quantization Backdoors to Deep Learning Commercial Frameworkscited by 25
- 2022ObjectSeeker: Certifiably Robust Object Detection against Patch Hiding Attacks via Patch-agnostic Maskingcited by 22
- 2022What You See is Not What the Network Infers: Detecting Adversarial Examples Based on Semantic Contradictioncited by 10
- 2018PeerNets: Exploiting Peer Wisdom Against Adversarial Attackscited by 8
- 2023Unsupervised Adversarial Detection without Extra Model: Training Loss Should Changecited by 4
- 2024Self-Supervised Representation Learning for Adversarial Attack Detectioncited by 4
- 2020Towards Certifiable Adversarial Sample Detectioncited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.