mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Exact Phase-Type Point Processes for Certified Measurement and Prediction of Event Streams

arXiv 2610.14948 ↗First posted 10 Oct 2026cs.LG q-fin.ST q-fin.TRcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Temporal point processes are used both to measure market mechanisms, for example how fast prices absorb news and how much of the reaction is the market responding to itself, and to predict the next event. We show that one algebraic object, the phase-type (Erlang-chain) state space, serves both purposes with exact likelihoods. For measurement, we build a multiscale phase-type Hawkes process whose parameters all enter linearly. Its log-likelihood is concave, and we compute the global maximum together with a Fenchel duality-gap certificate. A Markov embedding gives the response to an exogenous shock, echoes included, in closed form, and this response is stable if and only if the spectral radius of the branching matrix is below one. Applied to six markets around 670 scheduled macroeconomic releases (2022-2026) with a built-in placebo test, the model shows that the direct reaction to CPI, payrolls, PPI and the FOMC statement is absorbed in about a second, while the market's own echoes stretch half of the response to 16-137 s. For prediction, we introduce EPT-X, a neural point process that adds a history-dependent mixture-of-Erlang renewal channel to a linear Hawkes backbone. Its intensity and compensator remain in closed form, its states follow an affine recursion that trains with a parallel scan, and it can start from the certified fit of the measurement model. EPT-X has the best test likelihood on all five LOBSTER order-book streams and on Retweet and Taobao, and is level with the best published model on StackOverflow. We also find that the EasyTPP implementation of IntensityFree clamps short inter-event times before scoring, and that the gaps of the EasyTPP Amazon data are uniform on two fixed intervals.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Oct 2026.

Builds on

21 of 56 references.

References · 21

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  3. 2022Simplified State Space Layers for Sequence Modelingcited by 788
  4. 2020Transformer Hawkes Processcited by 235
  5. 2019Neural Jump Stochastic Differential Equationscited by 150
  6. 2019Intensity-Free Learning of Temporal Point Processescited by 140
  7. 2019Fully Neural Network based Model for General Temporal Point Processescited by 122
  8. 2021Neural Temporal Point Processes: A Reviewcited by 114
  9. 2020Neural Spatio-Temporal Point Processescited by 93
  10. 2021Transformer Embeddings of Irregularly Spaced Events and Their Participantscited by 93
  11. 2016Learning Granger Causality for Hawkes Processescited by 69
  12. 2023EasyTPP: Towards Open Benchmarking Temporal Point Processescited by 68
9 more
  1. 2016Uncovering Causality from Multivariate Hawkes Integrated Cumulantscited by 39
  2. 2024Decomposable Transformer Point Processescited by 16
  3. 2023On the Predictive Accuracy of Neural Temporal Point Process Models for Continuous-time Event Datacited by 14
  4. 2024HoTPP Benchmark: Are We Good at the Long Horizon Events Forecasting?cited by 13
  5. 2024Deep Continuous-Time State-Space Models for Marked Event Sequencescited by 11
  6. 2024Mamba Hawkes Processcited by 5
  7. 2025Advances in Temporal Point Processes: Bayesian, Neural, and LLM Approachescited by 3
  8. 2016Hawkes graphscited by 2
  9. 2025Hyper Hawkes Processes: Interpretable Models of Marked Temporal Point Processescited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.