mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Constrain Alignment with Sparse Autoencoders

arXiv 2411.07618 ↗First posted 12 Nov 2024cs.AI cs.CLcited by 11

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods

Abstract (arXiv)

The alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human preferences remains a key challenge. While post-training techniques like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) have achieved notable success, they often introduce computational inefficiencies and training instability. In this paper, we propose Feature-level constrained Preference Optimization (FPO), a novel method designed to simplify the alignment process while ensuring stability. FPO leverages pre-trained Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) and introduces feature-level constraints, allowing for efficient, sparsity-enforced alignment. Our approach enjoys efficiency by using sparse features activated in a well-trained sparse autoencoder and the quality of sequential KL divergence by using the feature-level offline reference. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that FPO achieves a 5.08% absolute improvement in win rate with much lower computational cost compared to state-of-the-art baselines, making it a promising solution for efficient and controllable LLM alignments.

Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 18 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2024.

Builds on

18 of 27 references.

Closest ancestors · 5

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Understanding Reference Policies in Direct Preference Optimization18 Jul
  2. 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
  3. 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimization18 Apr
  4. 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment25 Oct
  5. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar

Other references · 13

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  3. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  4. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  5. 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
  6. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  7. 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
  8. 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
  9. 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
  10. 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
  11. 2013Generating Sequences With Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 549
  12. 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381
1 more
  1. 2021Direct Behavior Specification via Constrained Reinforcement Learningcited by 30

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 3.

11 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024SparsePO: Controlling Preference Alignment of LLMs via Sparse Token Masks
  2. 2025Robust LLM Alignment via Distributionally Robust Direct Preference Optimization
  3. 2024Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier
  4. 2024Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment
  5. 2025Align-Pro: A Principled Approach to Prompt Optimization for LLM Alignment
  6. 2024Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment
  7. 2025RE-PO: Robust Enhanced Policy Optimization as a General Framework for LLM Alignment
  8. 2026A Zeroth-Order Paradigm for LLM Preference Alignment