Constrain Alignment with Sparse Autoencoders
On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → LLM preference optimization methods
Abstract (arXiv)
The alignment of large language models (LLMs) with human preferences remains a key challenge. While post-training techniques like Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) have achieved notable success, they often introduce computational inefficiencies and training instability. In this paper, we propose Feature-level constrained Preference Optimization (FPO), a novel method designed to simplify the alignment process while ensuring stability. FPO leverages pre-trained Sparse Autoencoders (SAEs) and introduces feature-level constraints, allowing for efficient, sparsity-enforced alignment. Our approach enjoys efficiency by using sparse features activated in a well-trained sparse autoencoder and the quality of sequential KL divergence by using the feature-level offline reference. Experimental results on benchmark datasets demonstrate that FPO achieves a 5.08% absolute improvement in win rate with much lower computational cost compared to state-of-the-art baselines, making it a promising solution for efficient and controllable LLM alignments.
Key facts. Cited by 11 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in LLM preference optimization methods, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 18 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Nov 2024.
Builds on
18 of 27 references.
Closest ancestors · 5
Same direction, newest first
- 2024Understanding Reference Policies in Direct Preference Optimization18 Jul
- 2024SimPO: Simple Preference Optimization with a Reference-Free Reward23 May
- 2024Token-level Direct Preference Optimization18 Apr
- 2023Zephyr: Direct Distillation of LM Alignment25 Oct
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback4 Mar
Other references · 13
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2023Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language Modelscited by 1,359
- 2024Length-Controlled AlpacaEval: A Simple Way to Debias Automatic Evaluatorscited by 865
- 2023Enhancing Chat Language Models by Scaling High-quality Instructional Conversationscited by 825
- 2013Generating Sequences With Recurrent Neural Networkscited by 549
- 2024Gemma Scope: Open Sparse Autoencoders Everywhere All At Once on Gemma 2cited by 381
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 7; 2026: 3.
11 papers.
- 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimizationcited by 35
- 2025Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atomscited by 23
- 2024Tracking the Feature Dynamics in LLM Training: A Mechanistic Studycited by 15
- 2025A Survey on Progress in LLM Alignment from the Perspective of Reward Designcited by 15
- 2025xJailbreak: Representation Space Guided Reinforcement Learning for Interpretable LLM Jailbreakingcited by 10
- 2025A Statistical Case Against Empirical Human-AI Alignmentcited by 6
- 2025Why Safeguarded Ships Run Aground? Aligned Large Language Models' Safety Mechanisms Tend to Be Anchored in The Template Regioncited by 5
- 2026LUCID-SAE: Learning Unified Vision-Language Sparse Codes for Interpretable Concept Discoverycited by 1
- 2026Disentangling Long-Term Memory via Latent Neuro-Symbolic Reasoningcited by 1
- 2025Towards Interpretable and Inference-Optimal COT Reasoning with Sparse Autoencoder-Guided Generationcited by 0
- 2026Safe Transformer: An Explicit Safety Bit For Interpretable And Controllable Alignmentcited by 0
- 2026Disentangling Long-Term Memory via Latent Neuro-Symbolic Reasoning16 Sep 2026
- 2026Safe Transformer: An Explicit Safety Bit For Interpretable And Controllable Alignment6 Mar 2026
- 2026LUCID-SAE: Learning Unified Vision-Language Sparse Codes for Interpretable Concept Discovery7 Feb 2026
- 2025Towards Interpretable and Inference-Optimal COT Reasoning with Sparse Autoencoder-Guided Generation2 Oct 2025
- 2025Beyond Prompt Engineering: Robust Behavior Control in LLMs via Steering Target Atoms23 May 2025
- 2025A Survey on Progress in LLM Alignment from the Perspective of Reward Design5 May 2025
- 2025A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization12 Mar 2025
- 2025A Statistical Case Against Empirical Human-AI Alignment20 Feb 2025
- 2025Why Safeguarded Ships Run Aground? Aligned Large Language Models' Safety Mechanisms Tend to Be Anchored in The Template Region19 Feb 2025
- 2025xJailbreak: Representation Space Guided Reinforcement Learning for Interpretable LLM Jailbreaking28 Jan 2025
- 2024Tracking the Feature Dynamics in LLM Training: A Mechanistic Study23 Dec 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024SparsePO: Controlling Preference Alignment of LLMs via Sparse Token Masks
- 2025Robust LLM Alignment via Distributionally Robust Direct Preference Optimization
- 2024Unified Preference Optimization: Language Model Alignment Beyond the Preference Frontier
- 2024Towards Efficient Exact Optimization of Language Model Alignment
- 2025Align-Pro: A Principled Approach to Prompt Optimization for LLM Alignment
- 2024Cal-DPO: Calibrated Direct Preference Optimization for Language Model Alignment
- 2025RE-PO: Robust Enhanced Policy Optimization as a General Framework for LLM Alignment
- 2026A Zeroth-Order Paradigm for LLM Preference Alignment